United Workers' Union

Case [2022] FWC 157


[2022] FWC 157

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.512—Right of entry

United Workers' Union

(RE2021/1386)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022

Application for a right of entry permit for Susannah Mary Kits – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.

  1. The United Workers' Union (UWU) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Ms Susannah Mary Kits. The Commission subsequently issued Ms Kits a right of entry permit which will expire on 21 December 2024.

  1. Ms Kits’ permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Ms Kits to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Ms Kits, I need to be satisfied that she is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.

Consideration

  1. In support of its application UWU filed declarations by Ms Kits and Mr Paul Richardson, Director – Finance, Governance and Administration (the Declarations).

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)

  1. According to the Declarations:

·   Ms Kits has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 29 November 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1]

·   Ms Kits has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]

·   Ms Kits has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]

·   Neither Ms Kits nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by her (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]

·   Ms Kits has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]

·   Ms Kits has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Ms Kits held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and

·   Ms Kits has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]

  1. I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Ms Kits is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)

  1. There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Ms Kits is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

Conclusion

  1. Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Ms Kits by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.

  1. Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Ms Kits is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

  1. A permit will be reissued to Ms Kits separately.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 30 November 2021 at (a) and UWU Certificate of Attendance dated 29 November 2021

[2] Ibid at (b)

[3] Ibid at (c)

[4] Ibid at (d)

[5] Ibid at (e)

[6] Ibid at (f)

[7] Ibid at (g)

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR737745>

Details
AGLC
United Workers' Union [2022] FWC 157
Case
[2022] FWC 157
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The United Workers' Union brought an application before the Federal Court of Australia on behalf of Susannah Mary Kits. Kits had been issued with a right of entry permit by the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection. However, the permit had never been received by Kits, and as a result, she was unable to enter Australia. The Union sought an order revoking the missing permit and reissuing a new permit to Kits.

The legal issues before the court involved the validity and effect of a permit that had not been received by the applicant, and the appropriate course of action in such circumstances. The court had to consider whether the permit could be considered invalid or revoked due to its non-receipt, and if so, whether a new permit could be issued in its place.

The court found that the permit could be considered revoked due to its non-receipt, as the permit was intended to grant Kits the right to enter Australia, and she had not been able to exercise that right. The court also found that a new permit could be issued in place of the revoked permit, as Kits still met the requirements for a right of entry permit. The court made an order revoking the missing permit and reissuing a new permit to Kits.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.