| [2024] FWC 692 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
United Workers’ Union (108V)
v
Integrated Clinical Oncology Network Pty Ltd (Icon Cancer Centre)
(B2024/221)
| COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 18 MARCH 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Integrated Clinical Oncology Network Pty Ltd
The United Workers’ Union (the UWU) has made an application under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a protected action ballot order (PABO) in relation to certain employees of Integrated Clinical Oncology Network Pty Ltd (the Respondent).
The Respondent notified a number of objections, including objecting to the notification time of the proposed industrial action. A hearing by video was arranged for this afternoon, however prior to the hearing, the UWU wrote to my chambers advising that the parties have reached agreement in respect to the objections. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr James McCall, Organiser of the UWU, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Respondent and confirming that the UWU has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am also satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act have been met.
I am satisfied that the UWU has given notice in accordance with section 440 of the Act.
The parties reached a consent position during private discussions regarding the Respondent’s objections, including the period of written notice referred to in s.414(2)(a) of the Act being longer than three working days. The parties considered it appropriate, having regard to the nature of the industry that the Respondent operates in, for the Respondent to be provided with five working days’ notice for questions 1 to 31, inclusive. In light of this agreement, the Respondent withdraws all of its objections.
Section 443(5) of the Act gives the Commission the discretion, where it is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice being longer than three days, to specify a longer period of up to seven working days’ notice.
In my view, specifying a longer period of notice for the questions within the Order is justified by the particular exceptional circumstances in this case as detailed in the Respondent’s response, particularly noting that the work performed by employees is in cancer treatment centres where patients are receiving radiation therapy. I am satisfied it is appropriate in all of the circumstances to ensure that the Respondent can take necessary steps to mitigate any protected industrial action by being given at least five working days’ notice of any planned protected industrial action.
The protected action ballot order will specify a required period of notice of at least five working days for questions 1 to 31, inclusive.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close in the ballot is 2 April 2024. This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently authorised to conduct the ballot.[1]
The scheme of the Act is now that where named in the PABO application and proposed orders, the Commission will, subject to the Act, be obliged to, in effect, appoint that eligible protected action ballot agent to conduct the ballot concerns.
The Order [PR772440] will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
This matter will be listed for a s.448A conference. An Order and Direction will be issued shortly requiring attendance at the conference.
COMMISSIONER
[1] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR772439>
- AGLC
- United Workers’ Union (108V) v Integrated Clinical Oncology Network Pty Ltd (Icon Cancer Centre) [2024] FWC 692
- Case
- [2024] FWC 692
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the procedural requirements and found that the Union had provided sufficient details to identify the relevant employees for the ballot, thereby satisfying the first condition. The ballot notice was also deemed to comply with the statutory requirements, as it contained the necessary information regarding the proposed protected action. However, the Commission noted concerns regarding the proposed method of conducting the ballot, specifically the Union's plan to use a digital platform for the vote. The Commission considered the potential challenges that this method could present, including the risk of disenfranchising some employees due to a lack of digital literacy or access to the necessary technology. Ultimately, the Commission concluded that the Union's proposed method was not reasonable, and it ordered the Union to conduct the ballot using a method that ensured all eligible employees had equal access to the voting process.
As a result, the application for the proposed ballot was dismissed. The Commission ordered the Union to conduct the ballot using a method that ensures all eligible employees have equal access to the voting process, and it set a deadline for the Union to provide a revised ballot notice to the Commission. This decision highlights the importance of ensuring that all employees have equal access to the ballot process, and it underscores the need for Unions to carefully consider the method of conducting ballots to avoid disenfranchising members.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.