United Voice v Mirotone Pty Ltd

Case

[2012] FWA 4670

31 MAY 2012

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2012] FWA 4670


FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

United Voice
v
Mirotone Pty Ltd
(B2012/141)

COMMISSIONER CARGILL

SYDNEY, 31 MAY 2012

Proposed protected action ballot by employees of Mirotone Pty Ltd.

[1] This is an application pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (theAct) by United Voice for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Mirotone Pty Ltd (the respondent).

[2] My associate received correspondence from the respondent acknowledging that it had been served with the application and did not contest the application.

[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

[4] I am satisfied that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met and that, accordingly, an order must be made. An order [PR524654] based on the draft order provided by the United Voice has issued in conjunction with this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A , PR524653>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0