United Voice v Jupiters Limited

[2011] FWA 8820

[2011] FWA 8820

FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.448 - Application for revocation of protected action ballot order

United Voice
v
Jupiters Limited
(B2011/4058)

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HARRISON SYDNEY, 15 DECEMBER 2011

Application to revoke order made in B2011/3821.

[1] An application has been made pursuant to s.448 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by United Voice (UV) to revoke an order for a protected action ballot. The application was lodged on 7 December 2011. It relates to an order 1 issued by Commissioner Asbury on 5 December 2011 in an application by UV for a protected action ballot in matter B2011/3821.

[2] Section 448 of the Act deals with revocation of protected action ballot orders and is set out below:

“448 Revocation of protected action ballot order

(1) An applicant for a protected action ballot order may apply to FWA, at any time before voting in the protected action ballot closes, to revoke the order.

(2) If an application to revoke a protected action ballot order is made, FWA must revoke the order.”

[3] UV was the applicant for the protected action ballot in matter B2011/3821 and is therefore eligible to make this application under s.448 of the Act. The voting pursuant to the order has not closed. This application is therefore made within the time prescribed by s.448(1) of the Act. In these circumstances, s.448(2) of the Act provides that Fair Work Australia must revoke the protected action ballot. An Order will issue accordingly.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

 1   PR517526

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR517986>