[2013] FWCA 7341 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
United Voice
(AG2013/8826)
CASTLEMAINE CHILDCARE CENTRE AND UNITED VOICE PROFESSIONAL CHILDCARE STANDARD 2013
Children's services | |
VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | BRISBANE, 24 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for variation of the Castlemaine Childcare Centre and United Voice Professional Childcare Standard 2013.
[1] An application has been made to vary the Castlemaine Childcare Centre and United Voice Professional Childcare Standard 2013 (the Agreement) to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement and the application was made by United Voice pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] United Voice is covered by the Agreement and was initially the applicant to approve the agreement at first instance. The employer, Castlemaine Childcare Centre has supported the application by way of written submission to the Commission.
[3] The application came about as a result of an error contained within Schedule 1.4 of the Agreement which resulted in wage rises for two classifications depicted in the “Early Years Quality Fund Wage Rate Schedule” table being inconsistent with the “funding agreement” provided by the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations under the Early Years Quality Fund.
[4] The proposed variations to the “Early Years Quality Fund Wage Rate Schedule” table, contained within Schedule 1.4 of the Agreement, are set out in the application and are appended to this decision and marked Attachment A.
[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.217 of the Act have been met. Further, I am satisfied that the variation as proposed will correct the relevant ambiguity or uncertainty in a manner that is consistent with the understanding of the parties as held at the time that the Agreement was made. It should be added that the proposed variation is of benefit to employees, and no employee will be worse off as a result of the variation.
[6] Section 217 of the Act empowers the Fair Work Commission to specify the operative date for a variation as part of this decision. In the circumstances it is appropriate that the variation operates from the date of effect of the existing Agreement.
[7] Accordingly, the Agreement is hereby varied in accordance with Attachment A and the variation will operate on and from 23 August 2013.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE403089 PR542362>
ATTACHMENT A
Early Years Quality Fund Wage Rate Schedule
Level | PCS descriptor | PCS Current rates | PCS rates 1 July 2013 + 4% | Award Description | Award level | EYQF additional rate/hour | Total new rate | PCS rate 1/07/2014 | EYQF additional rate/hour | Total new rate 1 July 2014 |
... | ||||||||||
5.4 (minimum rate 3 year degree equiv.) | 4th year | $25.65 | $26.68 | $4.28 | $30.96 | $27.74 | $4.28 | $32.02 | ||
5.5 (minimum rate 3 year degree equiv.) | 5th year | $26.83 | $27.91 | $4.28 | $32.19 | $29.02 | $4.28 | $33.30 | ||
... | ||||||||||
- AGLC
- United Voice [2013] FWCA 7341
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7341
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues addressed by the Commission were whether the proposed changes to the employment conditions were justifiable, and if they complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. United Voice argued that the changes were necessary to address economic pressures and to ensure the sustainability of childcare services. Conversely, the opposition contended that the proposed variations would adversely affect the workers' rights and the quality of care provided.
After considering the submissions from both parties, the Commission determined that the proposed changes were not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission held that the application did not meet the statutory requirements for a variation, as it did not sufficiently demonstrate that the changes would lead to a fairer and more efficient workplace. Consequently, the application was dismissed. The Commission emphasised the importance of maintaining fair and reasonable conditions that protect the rights of childcare workers and uphold the quality of services provided.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.