United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Fire Rescue Victoria

Case [2022] FWC 2577


[2022] FWC 2577

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

United Firefighters’ Union of Australia

v

Fire Rescue Victoria

(B2022/1439)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 26 SEPTEMBER 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Fire Rescue Victoria.

  1. This is an application by the United Firefighters’ Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Fire Rescue Victoria (Respondent).

  1. On 26 September 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Peter Marshall of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR746200.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR746199>

Details
AGLC
United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Fire Rescue Victoria [2022] FWC 2577
Case
[2022] FWC 2577
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission received an application from the United Firefighters’ Union of Australia for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Fire Rescue Victoria. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The union sought to conduct a ballot to determine whether the employees should take protected action in relation to their employment terms and conditions. The union contended that it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with Fire Rescue Victoria, but had been unable to do so. The union also sought to appoint Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS as the ballot agent, rather than the Australian Electoral Commission.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the union had met the requirements to conduct a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act, and whether CiVS was a fit and proper person to act as the ballot agent. The Commission considered the declaration from the union and the statutory declaration from CiVS in making its decision. The union had provided evidence that it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with Fire Rescue Victoria and that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the union had met the requirements to conduct a ballot. CiVS also provided a declaration from its Managing Director stating that it would carry out the functions of the ballot agent and that it had relevant experience. The Commission was satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and appointed it as the ballot agent.

The Fair Work Commission granted the union's application for a protected action ballot order. It appointed CiVS as the ballot agent for the ballot. The union is now able to conduct the ballot to determine whether the employees should take protected action in relation to their employment terms and conditions. The final orders were issued in PR746200.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.