United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Fire Rescue Victoria

Case [2022] FWC 2578


[2022] FWC 2578

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

United Firefighters’ Union of Australia
v

Fire Rescue Victoria

(B2022/1440)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 26 SEPTEMBER 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Fire Rescue Victoria.

  1. This is an application by the United Firefighters’ Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Fire Rescue Victoria (Respondent).

  1. On 26 September 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Peter Marshall of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR746202.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR746201>

Details
AGLC
United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Fire Rescue Victoria [2022] FWC 2578
Case
[2022] FWC 2578
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The United Firefighters' Union of Australia has applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Fire Rescue Victoria. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Fire Rescue Victoria did not object to the application, and the matter was decided on the papers without a hearing. The Union sought to hold a ballot to determine whether the employees should engage in protected action, and the Commission was required to determine whether the Union had satisfied the pre-conditions for holding such a ballot.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the Union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Fire Rescue Victoria and whether the notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had been met. The Union provided a declaration from Mr Peter Marshall, setting out the steps taken in bargaining with Fire Rescue Victoria and asserting that it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the Union had met the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act. The Union also sought to appoint Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS as the protected action ballot agent, rather than the Australian Electoral Commission. The Commission was satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and appointed it as the ballot agent.

The Fair Work Commission granted the Union's application for a protected action ballot order and appointed Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS as the ballot agent. An order was issued in PR746202. The Union is now able to proceed with the ballot to determine whether the employees should engage in protected action. The Commission's decision confirms the legal requirements that must be satisfied before a protected action ballot can be held and provides guidance on the process for appointing a ballot agent.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.