United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Country Fire Authority

Case [2023] FWC 343


[2023] FWC 343

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

United Firefighters’ Union of Australia
v

Country Fire Authority

(B2023/97)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 10 FEBRUARY 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of the Country Fire Authority

  1. This is an application by the United Firefighters’ Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Country Fire Authority (the Respondent).

  1. On 9 February 2023, my Associate was advised by the Respondent that it did not object to the protected action ballot order being made, subject to an extension of the notice period required from 3 working days to 7 working days for the taking of the industrial action identified in proposed questions 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 of the draft order. The Respondent indicated in their email that the Applicant did not oppose the issue. I sought the views of the Applicant, indicating that if I did not hear from them by 10am today I would proceed to determine the matter based on the material before the Commission, including the correspondence of the Respondent.

  1. No correspondence was received from the Applicant and neither party requested to be heard so in these circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Jeremy Murphy, of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. I am also satisfied based on the the material before me that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in s.414(2)(a) of the Act being longer than 3 working days for the taking of the industrial action identified in proposed questions 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 of the draft order and that in respect of these questions, I should exercise the discretionary power in s.443(5) of the Act and specify a period of 7 working days.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR750383.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR750382>

Details
AGLC
United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Country Fire Authority [2023] FWC 343
Case
[2023] FWC 343
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The United Firefighters' Union of Australia sought a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 in relation to certain employees of the Country Fire Authority. The application was made to the Fair Work Commission, with the Deputy President Clancy presiding over the matter in Melbourne on 10 February 2023. The Union aimed to conduct a ballot concerning proposed industrial action, and the Country Fire Authority did not object to the ballot order, provided there was an extension of the notice period for certain actions.

The legal issues that the court needed to address included whether the Union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the Country Fire Authority, and whether there were exceptional circumstances that justified extending the notice period for certain industrial actions. The court had to determine if the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met, and if so, whether the discretionary power in section 443(5) should be exercised to specify a longer notice period for certain actions.

In making its decision, the court considered the material before it, including the declaration of Mr. Jeremy Murphy, who stated that the Union had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement with the Country Fire Authority. The court was satisfied that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act were met. The court also found that there were exceptional circumstances that justified extending the notice period for certain industrial actions, and as such, exercised the discretionary power in section 443(5) of the Act to specify a period of 7 working days for the taking of these actions.

As a result of the court's decision, an order was issued separately in PR750383, granting the Union's application for a protected action ballot order with the specified conditions. The court did not hold a hearing, as neither party requested to be heard, and determined the matter based on the material before the Commission, including the correspondence of the Country Fire Authority.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.