Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005 (NSW)
2005 No 625
New South Wales
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
(Amendment No 3) 2005
under the
Civil Procedure Act 2005
The Uniform Rules Committee made the following rules of court under the Civil
Procedure Act 2005 on 28 September 2005.
Jennifer Atkinson
Secretary of the Rules Committee
| Published in Gazette No 121 of 30 September 2005, page 8159 | Page 1 |
| 2005 No 625 | |
| Rule 1 | Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005 |
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005
under the
Civil Procedure Act 2005
1 Name of Rules
These Rules are the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3)
2005.
2 Amendment of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 are amended as set out in
Schedule 1.
2005 No 625
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005
| Amendments | Schedule 1 |
| Schedule 1 | Amendments |
(Rule 2)
[1] Rule 3.4 Electronic filing of documents
Omit rule 3.4 (2). Insert instead:
(2)
In any proceedings, a document so specified may be filed in the court on behalf of a party, by means of the ECM system, by any registered user for the proceedings who is:
(a)
a person who is authorised by rule 4.4 to sign documents on the party’s behalf, or
(b)
a person who has been directed to file the document by a person who is so authorised.
(2A) When filed by means of the ECM system, a document that is
required to be signed by a person is taken:
(a) to have been duly signed for the purposes of rule 4.4, and (b) to have been duly authenticated for the purposes of section 14E of the Electronic Transactions Act 2000, if the person’s name is printed where his or her signature would
otherwise appear.[2] Rule 3.4A
Insert after rule 3.4:
3.4A Written record to be kept of direction to e-file document
(1)
A person who directs that a document be filed as referred to in rule 3.4 (2) (b) must make a written record of the fact that he or she has given such a direction.
(2) If the person by whom the direction was given is a legal
practitioner, the legal practitioner is taken:
(a)
to have affirmed to the court that he or she has given the direction, and
(b)
to have undertaken to the court that, if the court so directs, he or she will produce to the court the written record referred to in subrule (1).
(3) A written direction for the purposes of rule 3.4 (2) (b) is taken to
be a written record for the purposes of this rule.
2005 No 625
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005
| Schedule 1 | Amendments |
[3] Rule 3.9 Use of ECM system in business conducted in the absence of the public
Insert at the end of the rule:
(2) A legal practitioner who is a registered user for any proceedings
may participate in any such business:
(a) directly (the legal practitioner sends a communication in his or her own name), or (b) indirectly (someone authorised by the legal practitioner sends a communication in the legal practitioner’s name). (3) A legal practitioner who authorises someone else to send a communication, as referred to in subrule (2) (b), is taken to have affirmed to the court that he or she has actual knowledge of the contents of the communication.
[4] Rule 4.2 Documents to be filed to contain certain information
Insert after rule 4.2 (3):
(4) In this rule, originating process does not include any process (such as a statement of cross-claim or cross-summons) by which a cross-claim is made.
[5] Rule 4.4 Signing documents
Omit rule 4.4 (1) and (2). Insert instead:
(1) If, in any proceedings, a document is required to be signed by a party:
(a) in the case of a party who is represented by a solicitor, the document may not be signed by the party but must instead be signed: (i) by the party’s solicitor, or
(ii) by a solicitor acting as agent for the party’s solicitor, or
(iii) by some other solicitor belonging to the same firm or organisation (whether as partner or employee) as the party’s solicitor or party’s solicitor’s agent, and
(b)
in the case of a party who is not represented by a solicitor, the document may be signed by the party and may also be signed by any other person who is authorised by these rules to commence proceedings on the party’s behalf.
(2) Subrule (1) is subject to the requirements of rule 35.3.
2005 No 625
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005
| Amendments | Schedule 1 |
[6] Rule 4.4 (3)
Omit “subrules (1) and (2)”. Insert instead “subrule (1)”.
[7] Rule 4.13
Omit the rule. Insert instead:
4.13 Place for filing
(1) Subject to Part 3, a document (other than originating process) that
is filed in relation to any proceedings must be filed:
(a) subject to paragraphs (b) and (c), in the same registry as that in which the originating process was filed, or (b) if the proceedings have been transferred to another court, in the registry for that other court, or (c) if the court has ordered that documents are to be filed in some other registry, in that other registry. (2) In this rule, originating process does not include any process (such as a statement of cross-claim or cross-summons) by which a cross-claim is made.
[8] Rule 6.1 No step without originating process or notice of appearance
Omit rule 6.1 (2) (a).
[9] Rule 9.4 Defence
Omit “the cross-claim”. Insert instead “a statement of cross-claim”.
[10] Rule 9.5 Default of cross-defendant to cross-claim
Omit “the cross-claim” where firstly occurring.
Insert instead “a statement of cross-claim”.[11] Rule 12.1 Discontinuance of claim by consent
Omit rule 12.1 (1) (a). Insert instead:
(a) so far as they concern the whole of the plaintiff’s claim for relief, with the consent of each other active party, or
[12] Rule 12.8
Omit the rule. Insert instead:
12.8 Additional grounds for dismissal of proceedings by Supreme
Court (cf SCR Part 32A, rules 1 and 2)
(1) This rule applies to proceedings in the Supreme Court.
2005 No 625
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005
| Schedule 1 | Amendments |
(2) The Supreme Court may, of its own motion, make an order dismissing the proceedings if it appears from the Court’s records that, for over 5 months, no party to the proceedings has taken any step in the proceedings. (3) Such an order may not be made:
(a) if the proceedings, or any part of the proceedings, are listed for a future date, or (b) if there are any notices of motion or other applications in the proceedings that are yet to be determined, or (c) if a party satisfies the Supreme Court that such an order should not be made. (4) Before such an order is made, notice of the proposed order is to be given to the plaintiff and to each other active party, being a notice that gives each of them a reasonable opportunity to be heard in relation to the proposal. (5) Such a notice is to be sent by post, addressed to the person to
whom it is directed:
(a) at the person’s address for service, or (b) if the person has no address for service, at the person’s last known address, in an envelope marked with the Supreme Court’s return address. (6) A notice, posted as referred to in subrule (5), is taken to have been received by the person to whom it was addressed even if it is returned to the Supreme Court as having not been delivered to the addressee.
[13] Rule 21.3 List of documents to be prepared
Insert “(other than excluded documents)” after “all of the documents” in rule
21.3 (1).[14] Rule 41.13 Payment to partners
Omit “a master”. Insert instead “an associate Judge of the Supreme Court”.
[15] Rule 41.14 Payment to executors or administrators
Omit “a master” from rule 41.14 (1) (a).
Insert instead “an associate Judge of the Supreme Court”.[16] Rule 41.14 (2) (a)
Omit “a master”. Insert instead “an associate Judge of the Supreme Court”.
2005 No 625
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 3) 2005
| Amendments | Schedule 1 |
[17] Part 45, Division 3, heading
Omit “master”. Insert instead “associate Judge”.
[18] Rule 45.13 Notice of contention
Omit “master”. Insert instead “associate Judge”.
[19] Schedule 1 Application of rules
Omit “, 98 and 130” from Column 3 in relation to a Local Court sitting in its
Small Claims Division.Insert instead “and 98”.
[20] Schedule 4 Documents to be filed by means of ECM system
Insert in Schedule 4:
Statement of claim
Statement of cross-claim
Summons
Cross-summons
Notice of appearance
Defence
Reply
Notice of motion
Affidavit
Subpoena
Originating process under the Corporations Act 2001 of the
Commonwealth
Interlocutory process under the Corporations Act 2001 of the
Commonwealth
Liquidator’s consent under the Corporations Act 2001 of the
Commonwealth
[21] Dictionary
Omit the definition of hearing.
BY AUTHORITY
0
0
0