| [2016] FWCA 3415 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Unidrive Pty Ltd
(AG2016/3084)
UNIDRIVE PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 27 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Unidrive Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Unidrive Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Unidrive Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 June 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE419158 PR580860>
- AGLC
- Unidrive Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 3415
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3415
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission involved whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment, and whether it adhered to the statutory requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act. These requirements include provisions for minimum wages, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was appropriately negotiated.
In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission meticulously reviewed the terms of the agreement against the legislative standards. The Commission found that the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval. It was determined to provide fair and reasonable terms of employment, and that it complied with the statutory obligations under the Fair Work Act. The Commission also concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and was the result of appropriate negotiations between the parties.
Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the Unidrive Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016. This decision affirms the terms set out in the agreement, which will govern the employment conditions for the relevant employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.