UGL Solutions Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 1098


[2022] FWCA 1098

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

UGL Solutions Pty Ltd

(AG2022/661)

UGL Solutions Pty Ltd Esso Offshore and Onshore Maintenance Services Enterprise Agreement 2022

Oil and gas industry

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 30 MARCH 2022

Application for approval of the UGL Solutions Pty Ltd Esso Offshore and Onshore Maintenance Services Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UGL Solutions Pty Ltd Esso Offshore and Onshore Maintenance Services Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by UGL Solutions Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), The Australian Workers’ Union and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 April 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 November 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE515513  PR739789>

Details
AGLC
UGL Solutions Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1098
Case
[2022] FWCA 1098
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the applicant, UGL Solutions Pty Ltd, sought approval of the Enterprise Agreement (EA) which governs the employment of its employees who provide maintenance services for Esso Offshore and Onshore. The EA was the result of negotiations between the applicant and the union, United Voice NSW. The union opposed the application, arguing that the EA did not adequately protect employees' conditions.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the EA met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it was certified as a genuine agreement by the Australian Building and Construction Commission. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the EA complied with the national workplace relations system and whether it provided for minimum terms and conditions as prescribed by the Fair Work Act.

The Commission held that the EA met the statutory requirements for approval. It found that the EA provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, taking into account the nature of the work, the industry, and the bargaining positions of the parties. The Commission also found that the EA was a genuine agreement, as it was certified by the Australian Building and Construction Commission. Furthermore, the Commission held that the EA complied with the national workplace relations system and provided for minimum terms and conditions as prescribed by the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the EA, finding that it met the necessary legal criteria.

Accordingly, the Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement between UGL Solutions Pty Ltd and United Voice NSW. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements are negotiated in good faith and provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees. The approval of the EA provides certainty and stability to the parties and their employees, and ensures compliance with the national workplace relations system.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.