NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: UCC [2015] NSWCATGD 50 Hearing dates: 2 September 2015 Date of orders: 02 September 2015 Decision date: 02 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: J Anderson, Senior Member (Legal)
M Matheson, Senior Member (Professional)
M McCalman, General Member (Community)Decision: Guardianship order made for 12 months; private and alternate private guardian appointed to make decisions about accommodation, health care, and medical and dental treatment.
Financial management order made; two private managers appointed jointly and severally; order to be reviewed in 12 months.Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – application for the appointment of a guardian – person in respite care after admission to hospital as an involuntary patient – consideration of factors in section 14 of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) – concerns about the person travelling overseas at risk to himself – decisions can no longer be managed informally – guardianship order made – who should be appointed as guardian – consideration of section 17 of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) – private guardian and alternate guardian appointed
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – application for the appointment of a financial manager – whether the person is incapable of managing their affairs – need for a financial manager – best interests – financial management order made – consideration of section 25M of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) – who should be appointed as manager – private managers appointed jointly and severally – reviewable order madeLegislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 3(1), 3(2), 4, 14, and 25M
Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW)Cases Cited: C S and M Y v the Guardianship Tribunal and the Public Guardian (unreported) NSW Supreme Court 29 November 1999
H v H (unreported) NSW Supreme Court 20 March 2000
McD v McD (1983) 3 NSWLR 81
PY v RJS [1982] 2 NSWLR 700
Re GHI (a protected person) [2005] NSWSC 581Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr UCC (subject person)
Mrs NAC (an applicant and spouse of Mr UCC)
Ms IQC (an applicant)
The Public Guardian
The NSW Trustee and GuardianFile Number(s): 59897 Publication restriction: Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify a person involved in the Tribunal’s proceedings (s 65, Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)).
REASONS FOR DECISION
What the Tribunal decided
-
The Tribunal appointed Mrs NAC as Mr UCC's guardian, and Ms IQC as alternative guardian for a period of 12 months to make decisions on his behalf about his accommodation, health care, and medical and dental treatment as set out in the Tribunal's Order.
AND
-
The Tribunal appointed Mrs NAC and Ms IQC jointly and severally as Mr UCC's financial managers, subject to the authorities and directions ordered by the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
Background
-
Mr UCC is a 75-year gentleman who is currently in respite care at an aged care facility in Northern Sydney. On 14 January 2015, Mr UCC was admitted to the Aged Care Psychiatry and…
Continue reading UCC
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- UCC [2015] NSWCATGD 50
- Case
- [2015] NSWCATGD 50
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to consider the application in accordance with the provisions of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW). In particular, section 14 of the Act required the court to consider the person’s past history, present circumstances, and future needs, and the court was required to make an order if the person was incapable of managing themselves or their affairs. The court was also required to consider section 17 of the Act, which required the court to appoint a private guardian or an alternate private guardian. The court was also required to consider section 25M of the Act, which required the court to appoint a private manager or managers if the court considered that it was necessary for the protection of the person or for their best interests.
The court considered that the person was incapable of managing themselves or their affairs and that the application should be granted. The court considered that the daughter should be appointed as the private guardian, and that an alternate private guardian should also be appointed. The court also considered that a financial management order should be made, and that two private managers should be appointed jointly and severally. The court made an order for the appointment of a guardian and a financial manager for a period of 12 months, with a review of the order in 12 months’ time.
The court made a guardianship order appointing the daughter as the private guardian, and another person as the alternate private guardian. The court also made a financial management order appointing two private managers jointly and severally. The court ordered that the orders be reviewed in 12 months’ time.
Orders
Orders of the court
Guardianship order made for 12 months; private and alternate private guardian appointed to make decisions about accommodation, health care, and medical and dental treatment.
Financial management order made; two private managers appointed jointly and severally; order to be reviewed in 12 months.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.