NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: TZM [2019] NSWCATGD 6 Hearing dates: 6 March 2019 Date of orders: 06 March 2019 Decision date: 06 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: A R Boxall, Senior Member (Legal)
A M Matheson, Senior Member (Professional)
E Lyne, General Member (Community)Decision: 1. A guardianship order is made for TZM.
2. NBI of [address removed for publication.] is appointed as the guardian.
3. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of 12 months from 6 March 2019.
4. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian(s) custody of TZM to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.
FUNCTIONS:
5. The guardian has the following functions:
a) Accommodation
To decide where TZM may reside.
b) Health care
To decide what health care TZM may receive.
c) Medical/Dental consent
To make substitute decisions about proposed minor or major medical or dental treatment, where TZM is not capable of giving a valid consent.
d) Services
To make decisions about services to be provided to TZM.
CONDITIONS:
6. The condition of this order is:
a) Standard Condition
In exercising this role the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring TZM to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider their views before making significant decisions.Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – application for a guardianship order – subject person needing medical treatment – persons responsible available – failure of hospital to identify and recognise authority of person responsible – practical necessity for appointment of a guardian – guardianship order made – appointment of private guardian.
GENERAL – Part 5 of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) – operation of the “person responsible” regimeLegislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), Pts 3, 5, ss 3(1)–(2), 4, 14, 14(2), 15(3), 17(1), 33A, 33A(4)(d), 35–37 Cases Cited: C S and M Y v the Guardianship Tribunal and the Public Guardian (Supreme Court (NSW), Windeyer J, 29 November 1999, unrep
IF v IG [2004] NSWADTAP 3
P v D1 & Ors [2011] NSWSC 257
Re B [2011] NSWSC 1075Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: 001: Guardianship Application
TZM (the person)
NBI (applicant)
Public GuardianRepresentation: Nil
File Number(s): NCAT 2018/00369527 Publication restriction: Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal’s proceedings (s 65, Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)).
REASONS FOR DECISION
GUARDIANSHIP APPLICATION
Background
-
TZM is 70-years-old and is a long-term resident of a group home in regional NSW operated by disability service provider. For approximately the last two and a half months, however, she has been an inpatient at hospitals in regional NSW – initially Hospital A, and subsequently Hospital B. The reason for her hospitalisation is severe osteomyelitis of the knee, for which she has been receiving treatment as an inpatient. TZM is reported to have Down’s syndrome and an intellectual disability. TZM is also said…
Continue reading TZM
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- TZM [2019] NSWCATGD 6
- Case
- [2019] NSWCATGD 6
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether a guardianship order should be made for TZM, given that persons responsible for them were available but not recognised by the hospital. The court had to consider the operation of the "person responsible" regime under Part 5 of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) and whether there was a practical necessity for the appointment of a guardian.
The court found that, despite the availability of persons responsible for TZM, the hospital's failure to identify and recognise their authority created a situation where it was practically necessary to appoint a guardian. The court considered the welfare and best interests of TZM and concluded that a guardianship order was required to ensure that they received the necessary medical treatment. The court appointed NBI as the guardian and outlined the specific functions and conditions of the guardianship order, including the requirement for the guardian to consider TZM's views before making significant decisions.
The court made a guardianship order for TZM, appointing NBI as the guardian. The order is a continuing guardianship order for a period of 12 months from 6 March 2019 and is limited to specific functions such as deciding TZM's accommodation, health care, and medical/dental consent. The guardian must take reasonable steps to involve TZM in decision-making processes.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. A guardianship order is made for TZM.
2. NBI of [address removed for publication.] is appointed as the guardian.
3. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of 12 months from 6 March 2019.
4. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian(s) custody of TZM to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.
FUNCTIONS:
5. The guardian has the following functions:
a) Accommodation
To decide where TZM may reside.
b) Health care
To decide what health care TZM may receive.
c) Medical/Dental consent
To make substitute decisions about proposed minor or major medical or dental treatment, where TZM is not capable of giving a valid consent.
d) Services
To make decisions about services to be provided to TZM.
CONDITIONS:
6. The condition of this order is:
a) Standard Condition
In exercising this role the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring TZM to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider their views before making significant decisions.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.