| [2022] FWCA 1991 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Tyco Australia Group Pty Ltd
(AG2022/1582)
ADT Security Response Centre Enterprise Agreement (2021-2024)
| Security services | |
| COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 17 JUNE 2022 |
Application for approval of the ADT Security Response Centre Enterprise Agreement (2021-2024)
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ADT Security Response Centre Enterprise Agreement (2021-2024) (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Tyco Australia Group Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in ss.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
I observe that clause 17 of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting the NES precedence undertaking attached in Annexure A, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 24 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516315 PR742761>
- AGLC
- Tyco Australia Group Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1991
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1991
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC commenced its analysis by examining the process through which the agreement was made. It assessed whether there was genuine bargaining between the parties, and if the agreement was made in good faith. The court then moved on to consider the substantive provisions of the agreement, ensuring that it included all the minimum terms and conditions mandated by the Fair Work Act. The FWC also evaluated whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, taking into account any relevant industry benchmarks and comparative data.
After thorough consideration of the evidence and arguments presented, the FWC concluded that the ADT Security Response Centre Enterprise Agreement (2021-2024) met the criteria for approval. The FWC found that the agreement was made in good faith, and it contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions. The court also determined that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, taking into account the specific circumstances of the workplace and the bargaining context. As a result, the FWC approved the agreement, and it came into effect on the specified date.
In its decision, the FWC emphasised the importance of genuine bargaining and good faith in the enterprise agreement process. It also highlighted the need for agreements to provide fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees, while still allowing for flexibility in the workplace. The FWC's approval of the ADT Security Response Centre Enterprise Agreement (2021-2024) serves as a reminder of the role of the Fair Work Commission in ensuring that enterprise agreements are made in accordance with the law and provide a fair outcome for both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.