Two Siblings Pty Ltd atf Latra Trust (Migration)

[2021] AATA 1675

Two Siblings Pty Ltd atf Latra Trust (Migration) [2021] AATA 1675 (6 April 2021)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Two Siblings Pty Ltd atf Latra Trust

CASE NUMBER:  1804088

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2017/985334

MEMBER:George Hallwood

DATE:6 April 2021

PLACE OF DECISION:  Adelaide

DECISION:The Tribunal sets aside the decision not to approve the nomination and substitutes a decision that the nomination is approved.

Statement made on 06 April 2021 at 8:29am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination – approval of nominated position – specified occupation – Cook – inapplicability conditions – limited service restaurant – seating for between 30 and 50 patrons – full commercial kitchen on site using fresh raw ingredients – labour market testing – international trade obligation – Free Trade Agreement between Australia and Hong Kong, China (A-HKFTA) – decision under review set aside

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 140GB, 140GBA

Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 2.72, 2.73

CASES
Cargo First Pty Ltd v MIBP [2016] FCA 30

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 1 February 2018 to refuse to approve the applicant’s nomination under s.140GB of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) and r.2.72 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).

2. The applicant applied for approval on 13 March 2017. A nomination of an occupation for a Subclass 457 visa is made under s.140GB of the Act and r.2.73 of the Regulations. Regulations 2.72(3) to (12) prescribe the criteria that must be satisfied for the Minister to approve a nomination by a person. These criteria are extracted in the attachment to this decision. For nomination applications made from 23 November 2013, additional criteria are specified in s.140GBA.

3. The delegate decided not to approve the nomination on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy 2.72(10)(aa) because the delegate found that the position related to the nominated occupation was in a limited service restaurant and because of this was excluded by instrument from the list of eligible skilled occupations.

4. Ms Lara Lukich appeared before the Tribunal by video on behalf of the applicant, Two Siblings Pty Ltd atf Latra Trust, on 9 March 2021 to give evidence and present arguments. The hearing was combined with the related subclass 457 visa application file 1807443 hearing and the Tribunal also received evidence via video from Ms Kit Yee Kan, the related subclass 457 visa nominee (the nominee). 

5. The Tribunal exercised its discretion to hold the hearing by video. The hearing was held during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal determined it was reasonable to hold a hearing by video, having regard to the nature of this matter and the individual circumstances of the applicant. The Tribunal also had regard to the Tribunal’s objective of providing a mechanism of review that is fair, just, economical and quick, and the delay to the matter if the hearing was not to be conducted by telephone. No concerns were raised by the applicant either to the hearing being combined or the hearing being held by video and the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was given a fair opportunity to give evidence and present arguments.

6. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by its registered migration agent.

1. The applicant operates Tom’s Wholesome Food, which at the time of the application was a café and delicatessen in Leederville Western Australia. As a result of the impact of COVID, the applicant’s operations are in the process of moving to 290 Beaufort Street Perth.

2. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to set aside the decision under review and substitute a decision approving the nomination.

CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

1. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets the criteria for approval of the nomination. The Tribunal must approve the nomination if the applicant is an approved sponsor and meets the requirements in r.2.72: s.140GB(2). The applicant must also have paid any nomination training contribution charge in relation to the nomination for which they are liable, but this liability only arises for nominations made from 12 August 2018. In addition, for nominations made from 23 November 2013, s.140GBA must be met.

The nomination must comply with the prescribed process

1. Regulation 2.72(3) requires that the applicant has made the nomination in accordance with the process set out in r.2.73.

2. The Tribunal has had regard to the material on the Department’s file and further information provided by the applicant and is satisfied that the application was compliant with the process set out in r.2.73:

   ·The applicant is nominating an occupation, Cook (ANZSCO 351411) under s.140GB(1)(b): r.2.73(1A)(a);

   ·The applicant identifies in the nomination an applicant for a Subclass 457 visa, Ms Kan, as the person who will work in the occupation: r.2.73(1A)(b);

   ·The nomination was made using the approved form and fee for Business Visas: r.2.73(2), (3), (5) & (9);

   ·The applicant has identified the nominee, Ms Kan, in the nomination: r.2.73(4A) and r.2.72(5);

   ·The applicant has provided the certification in the nomination in respect of whether or not the person has engaged in conduct that constitutes a contravention of s.245AR(1) of the Act: r.2.73(4B); and

   ·The nomination includes the location at which the occupation will be carried out - Leederville Western Australia, and the name – Cook and 6 digit ANZSCO code – 351411 as the applicant is a standard business sponsor; as well as the relevant certifications mentioned in r.2.72(10): r.2.73(4A).

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(3) are met.

Nominator is a standard business sponsor or party to a work agreement

1. Regulation 2.72(4) requires that the person making a nomination is either a standard business sponsor or a party to a work agreement other than a Minister.

2. Departmental records indicate the applicant is a standard business sponsor approved on 17 February 2021 and effective until 16 February 2026.

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(4) are met.

Identification of the nominee

1. Regulation 2.72(5) requires that the applicant identify in the nomination the visa holder, or the applicant or proposed applicant for the visa, who will work in the nominated occupation.

2. Ms Kan was identified as the applicant for the visa in the applicant’s subclass 457 nomination.

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(5) are met.

Requirements for existing Subclass 457 visa holders

1. The criteria for approval of a nomination contain several requirements if a Subclass 457 visa holder is identified as the person to work in the nominated position.

2. As the nominee is not the holder of a Subclass 457 visa, the requirements of r.2.72(6), (7A) and (10)(g) do not apply.

Information about the nominated occupation

1. Regulation 2.72(8A) requires the applicant to provide the following information as part of the nomination:

   ·the name of the occupation and the corresponding 6-digit ANZSCO code if there is one;

   ·if there is no such code, and the applicant is a standard business sponsor, the name of the occupation and the corresponding 6-digit code as specified in the relevant instrument; or if the applicant is a party to a work agreement the name of the occupation and the corresponding 6-digit code (if any) as specified in the work agreement; and

   ·the location(s) at which the nominated occupation is to be carried out.

2. As part of the nomination, the applicant provided:

   ·the nomination including the 6 digit ANZSCO code – 351411 for the nominated occupation Cook; and

   ·as part of the nomination the location - Leederville Western Australia is listed as the place at which the nominated occupation is to be carried out.

3. Accordingly, the Tribunal is satisfied that the required information has been provided in the nomination.

4. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(8A) are met.

Certification relating to conduct under s.245AR(1)

1. Regulation 2.72(8B) requires that the applicant has, as part of the nomination, certified in writing whether or not they have engaged in conduct, in relation to the nomination, that constitutes a contravention of s.245AR(1) of the Act.

2. The Tribunal is satisfied that the required certification has been provided in the relevant nomination where Ms Kit Yee Kan was the nominee.

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(8B) are met.

No adverse information known to Immigration

1. Regulation 2.72(9) requires that either: there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the applicant or a person associated with the applicant; or it is reasonable to disregard such information. For these purposes, ‘adverse information’ and ‘associated with’ have the meaning given in rr.1.13A and 1.13B.

2. There is no evidence before the Tribunal to indicate that adverse information is known to Immigration about the applicant or an associated person.

3. At the hearing the applicant informed the Tribunal that they were not aware of any adverse information known to Immigration.

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(9) are met.

Specified occupation

1. Regulation 2.72(10)(aa) as it applies in this case, requires that the nominated occupation and its 6-digit code correspond to an occupation and 6-digit code specified in instrument IMMI 17/060, and the occupation must be applicable to the person identified in the nomination in accordance with the instrument. In certain circumstances this instrument may also require the nomination of an occupation to be supported in writing to the Minister, by a specified organisation before the nomination can be approved: r.2.72(10)(b).

2. The nominated occupation of Cook with the six digit code 351411 is specified at item 202 in Section 7 of the relevant instrument IMMI 17/060.

1. Section 8 of IMMI 17/060 sets out positions for which the specified occupation is inapplicable and includes:

   ·     At item 7: The position is involved in mass production in a factory setting; and

   ·     At item 8: The position is in a limited service restaurant.

1. Information provided to the Tribunal demonstrated to my satisfaction that the position was not involved in mass production in a factory setting and so is not captured by the exclusion contained at item 7 of S.8 of IMMI 17/060.

2. Section 4 of IMMI 17/060 provides a definition of the term ‘limited service restaurant’ as including the following:

   a.a fast food or takeaway food service;

   b.a fast casual restaurant;

   c.a drinking establishment that offers only limited food service;

   d.a limited service café, including a coffee shop or mall café;

   e.a limited service pizza restaurant.

3. The applicant submitted that the business is engaged in a family run restaurant providing home style wholesome food and beverage serving services for consumption on the premises and that there is seating for between 30 and 50 patrons to eat meals and drink beverages. The applicant retains qualified and trained staff. Home style cooked meals are prepared in a full commercial kitchen on site using fresh raw ingredients, unlike fast food outlets, fast casual restaurants, or limited service café’s that buy in pre-prepared foods to reheat and provide to customers. The applicant submitted that breakfasts and lunches are made to order from fresh ingredients and suiting clients specific needs. Meals are served to the table on plates, with cutlery, not in disposable containers. Eat in customers order at the table and can pay at the table.

4. The new building and fit out is designed to deliver a restaurant experience for customers. Seventy five percent of sales are food and largely home style meals.

5. For these reasons the Tribunal is satisfied that the position is not in a limited service restaurant and so is not captured by the exclusion contained at item 8 of S.8 of IMMI 17/060.

6. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(10)(aa) are met.

7. There is no requirement for this nomination to be supported by a specified organisation.

8. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(10)(b) are met.

Terms and conditions of employment

1. Regulation 2.72(10)(c) requires that the terms and conditions of employment of the nominee will be no less favourable than those that are, or would be, provided to an Australian citizen or permanent resident performing equivalent work at the same location. For nomination applications made after 1 December 2015, this expressly includes, if applicable, the terms and conditions provided by an enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009.

2. A set of terms and conditions of employment is less favourable than another set if the earnings provided for in the first set are less than those in the other set and there is no substantial contrary evidence that the first set is not less favourable than the other set: r.2.57(3A). ‘Earnings’ is defined in r.2.57A and includes the person’s wages; amounts applied or dealt with in any way on the person’s behalf or as the person directs; and the agreed money value of non-monetary benefits. Non-monetary benefits are benefits other than an entitlement to a payment of money to which the employee is entitled in return for the performance of work and for which a reasonable money value has been agreed by the employee and the employer. Reimbursements are specifically excluded, as are payments the amount of which cannot be determined in advance, and certain contributions to a superannuation fund.

3. In circumstances where there are no Australian citizens or permanent residents performing equivalent work at the same location, the person must determine the terms and conditions of employment that would otherwise be provided by a method specified in instrument IMMI 09/113: r.2.72(10AA).

4. These requirements do not apply if the annual earnings of the nominee are equal to or greater than those specified in the written instrument IMMI 13/028: r.2.72(10AB).

5. Ms Kan’s annual earnings are not equal to or greater than the $250,000 specified in the written instrument IMMI 13/028

6. As there are no Australian citizens or permanent residents performing equivalent work at the same location, the applicant put to the Tribunal that the terms and conditions of employment were provided in accord with the method specified in instrument IMMI 09/113: r.2.72(10AA). In particular:

   ·The role of Cook would be based on an annualised salary according to clause 20 of the Restaurant Industry Award.

   ·The applicant would recruit a Cook Grade 2 Level 3 (pay level $21.92 per hour). At a 38 hour week this equates to $43,313.92 which together with an equivalent clause 20 uplift to 125% equates to $54,142.40 annually. The applicant stated that this is what an Australian equivalent could expect to be paid.

   ·Ms Kan’s contract of employment dated 10 March 2021 provides a salary of $56,000 plus superannuation of 9.5% and contains a standard set of leave entitlements, work hours and other terms and conditions of employment;

   ·Ms Kan’s contract demonstrates that the nominee’s earnings are no less favourable than those for the relevant Australian equivalent.

   ·There is no substantial contrary evidence before the Tribunal that the nominee’s set of terms and conditions is not less favourable than the Australian equivalent’s set.

7. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(10)(c) are met.

Base rate of pay

1. Regulation 2.72(10)(cc) requires the base rate of pay under the terms and conditions of employment that are, or would be, provided to an Australian citizen or permanent resident will be greater than the temporary skilled migration income threshold (TSMIT) specified in the instrument IMMI 13/028 which is relevantly $53,900.

2. However, this requirement may be disregarded if the base rate of pay will not be greater than the TSMIT, the annual earnings are equal to or greater than the TSMIT and the Minister considers it reasonable to do so: r.2.72(10A). The ‘base rate of pay’ means the rate of pay payable to an employee for his or her ordinary hours of work, but does not include incentive-based payments and bonuses, loadings, monetary allowances, overtime or penalty rates or any other separately identifiable amounts: r.2.57. The meaning of ‘earnings’ is provided in r.2.57A.

3. Likewise, the requirement in r.2.72(10)(cc) does not apply if the annual earnings of the nominee are equal to or greater than those specified in the instrument IMMI 13/028: r.2.72(10AB) which is relevantly $250,000.

4. The Tribunal finds that in relation to the requirements of r.2.72(10)(cc):

For the nominee:

·the nominee’s annual earnings are $56,000; and

·the annual earnings are less than the income threshold of $250,000 specified in the instrument for r.2.72(10AB).

For the Australian equivalent

·the base rate of pay under the terms and conditions of the equivalent Australian citizen or permanent resident is $54,142.40;

·the relevant TSMIT amount is $53,900;

·therefore, the base rate of pay for the Australian equivalent is greater than TSMIT.

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(10)(cc) are met.

Certification under r.2.72(10)(e)

1. As part of the nomination, the applicant must relevantly certify various matters in writing: r.2.72(10)(e). These include that:

   ·the tasks of the position include a significant majority of the tasks of the nominated occupation listed in the ANZSCO or specified in the relevant instrument.

   ·if the applicant is lawfully operating a business outside, but not in, Australia, the nominated occupation is in the business of the standard business sponsor or is specified in the relevant instrument.

   ·if the applicant lawfully operates a business in Australia, the nominated occupation is with a business, or an associated entity, of the applicant or else, is an occupation specified in relevant instrument. and

   ·the qualifications and experience of the nominee are commensurate with those specified for the occupation in the ANZSCO or, if there is no ANZSCO code, in the relevant instrument.

2. Having viewed the nomination application the Tribunal is satisfied that the relevant certifications for the above matters have been made in the nomination form.

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(10)(e) are met.

Position must be genuine

1. Regulation 2.72(10)(f) requires that the position associated with the nominated occupation is genuine. This was considered in Cargo First Pty Ltd v MIBP [2016] FCA 30, where the Court (at [34]) upheld the Tribunal’s approach of qualitatively assessing the position and comparing this with the occupation nominated in order to determine whether it was genuine.

2. The applicant stated that they need the position because it is consistent with and essential to the business. The Cook is the powerhouse of the business and one which has existed for 11 years. It is an essential role in a business generating close to 75% of the $850,000 of the business revenue.

3. The duties of the position of Cook as described in the provided position description include a significant majority of the tasks of the nominated occupation of Cook (351411) as described in ANZSCO.

4. Oral evidence given by Ms Kan and Ms Lukich was consistent with the position associated with the nominated occupation being what it purports to be.

5. Financial statements of the business demonstrate that the business is capable of supporting the position. Cash flow projection is based on previous years. Strong client base.

1. For these reasons the Tribunal is satisfied that the position exists, is what it purports to be, and is genuine.

2. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(10)(f) are met.

Employment under contract

1. Regulation 2.72(10)(h) requires that the applicant will engage the nominee only as an employee under a written contract of employment and give a copy of that to the Minister, unless the nominated occupation is specified in the relevant instrument.

1. The applicant has provided a copy of the employment contract signed on 10 March 2021 in respect of the nominee.

1. For these reasons the requirements of r.2.72(10)(h) are met.

Work agreements

1. Separate criteria apply where the applicant is a party to a work agreement (other than a Minister): r.2.72(11), (12). In these circumstances, the nominated occupation must be specified in the work agreement as an occupation that the person may nominate. Certain matters relating to the tasks of the position and the qualifications and experience of the nominee must be certified as part of the nomination. In addition, if the work agreement specifies requirements that must be met by the applicant, these must have been met.

2. As the applicant is not party to a work agreement the requirements of r.2.72(11) and (12) are not applicable.

Labour Market Testing

1. Section 140GBA requires a standard business sponsor who nominates an occupation and associated position, to fulfil the ‘labour market testing condition’ unless the major disaster or skill and occupational exemptions in s.140GBB-140GBC apply, or the Minister has determined it would be inconsistent with a specified international trade obligation.

2. For these purposes, labour market testing means testing of the Australian labour market to demonstrate whether a suitably qualified and experienced Australian citizen or permanent resident is readily available to fill the position. To satisfy the labour market testing condition, the testing must be undertaken within a prescribed period as set out in IMMI 13/136. In addition:

   ·the nomination must be accompanied by the evidence specified in s.140GBA(5) and (6) relating to labour market testing, and information about any Australian citizen or permanent resident redundancies or retrenchments from relevant occupations in the previous four months; and

   ·the Minister must be satisfied a suitably qualified and experienced Australian citizen, permanent resident or eligible temporary visa holder (as defined) is not readily available to fill the nominated position.

3. The evidence of labour market testing that must accompany the nomination relates to information about attempted recruitment, including details of advertising for the position or similar positions, and advertising fees and expenses. It may also include information about the sponsor’s participation in relevant job and career expos, details of other fees, expenses and results for recruitment attempts, and other evidence such as recent labour market trend research, expressions of government support, or other evidence specified by the Minister. However, if this optional information and evidence is not provided, the nomination is not to be treated less favourably. If there are any relevant redundancies or retrenchments, the labour market testing must have been undertaken after those events.

4. The Minister has determined that labour market testing it would be inconsistent with a specified international trade obligation, specifically in the instrument LIN 20/029 which includes the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and Hong Kong, China (A-HKFTA).

1. For these reasons, the labour market testing requirements in s.140GBA are not applicable.

Concluding paragraph

1. For the reasons given above, the applicant meets all the applicable criteria for the nomination to be approved.

DECISION

1. The Tribunal sets aside the decision not to approve the nomination and substitutes a decision that the nomination is approved.

George Hallwood
Member

ATTACHMENT - EXTRACTS FROM THE MIGRATION REGULATIONS 1994

2.72 Criteria for approval of nomination — Subclass 457…

(1)This regulation applies to a person who is:

(a)is any of the following:

(i) a standard business sponsor;

(ii) a person who has applied to be a standard business sponsor;

(iii) a party to a work agreement (other than a Minister);

(iv) a party to negotiations to a work agreement (other than a Minister); and

(b)a party to a work agreement (other than a Minister);

who, under paragraph 140GB (1) (b) of the Act, has nominated an occupation in relation to a holder of, or an applicant or a proposed applicant for, a [Subclass 457 visa].

(2)For subsection 140GB (2) of the Act, the criteria that must be satisfied for the Minister to approve a nomination by a person are set out in subregulations (3) to (12).

(3)The Minister is satisfied that the person has made the nomination in accordance with the process set out in regulation 2.73.

(4)The Minister is satisfied that the person is:

(a)a standard business sponsor; or

(b)a party to a work agreement (other than a Minister).

(5)The Minister is satisfied that the person has identified in the nomination the visa holder, or the applicant or proposed applicant for the visa, who will work in the nominated occupation.

(6)If the person identifies a holder of a [Subclass 457 visa] (the visa holder) for subregulation (5), the Minister is satisfied that the person:

(a)has listed on the nomination each other holder of a visa of that kind who was granted the visa on the basis of having the necessary relationship with the visa holder as mentioned in clause 457.321 of Schedule 2; and

(b)if the Minister requires the visa holder to demonstrate that he or she has the skills necessary to perform the occupation — the visa holder demonstrates that he or she has those skills in the manner specified by the Minister.

(7)For paragraph (6) (a), the Minister may disregard the fact that 1 or more persons required to be listed on the nomination are not listed, if the Minister is satisfied it is reasonable in the circumstances to do so.

(7A)In addition to subregulation (6):

(a)if:

(i)       the person identifies a holder of a [Subclass 457 visa] (the visa holder) for subregulation (5); and

(ii)      the [Subclass 457 visa] was granted after the Minister had waived the requirements of paragraph 4006A (1) (c) of Schedule 4 on the basis of a written undertaking made by the current sponsor of the visa holder (as set out in subclause 4006A (2) of that Schedule);

the Minister is satisfied that the person has provided, in writing, an undertaking that is equivalent to the undertaking made by the current sponsor of the visa holder; and

(b)if:

(i)       the person identifies a holder of a [Subclass 457 visa] (the visa holder) for subregulation (5); and

(ii)      the person has listed on the nomination a person described in paragraph (6) (a); and

(iii)     the [Subclass 457 visa] was granted to the person described in paragraph (6) (a) after the Minister had waived the requirements of paragraph 4006A (1) (c) of Schedule 4 on the basis of a written undertaking made by the current sponsor of the visa holder (as set out in subclause 4006A (2) of that Schedule);

the Minister is satisfied that the person has provided, in writing, an undertaking that is equivalent to the undertaking made by the current sponsor of the visa holder.

(8)If the nomination was made before 1 July 2010 — the Minister is satisfied that the person has provided the following information as part of the nomination:

(a)if there is a 6‑digit ASCO code for the nominated occupation — the 6-digit ASCO code;

(b)if there is no 6-digit ASCO code for the occupation, and the person is a standard business sponsor — the name of the occupation as it appears in the instrument in writing made for the purposes of paragraph (10) (a);

(c)if there is no 6-digit ASCO code for the occupation and the person is a party to a work agreement — the name of the occupation as it appears in the work agreement;

(d)the location or locations at which the nominated occupation is to be carried out.

(8A)If the nomination is made on or after 1 July 2010 – the Minister is satisfied that the person has provided the following information as part of the nomination:

(a)if there is a 6-digit ANZSCO code for the nominated occupation - the name of the occupation and the corresponding 6-digit ANZSCO code;

(b)if:

(i)       there is no 6-digit ANZSCO code for the nominated occupation; and

(ii)      the person is a standard business sponsor;

the name of the occupation and the corresponding 6-digit code as they are specified in the instrument in writing made for paragraph (10)(aa);

(c)if:

(i)       there is no 6-digit ANZSCO code for the nominated occupation; and

(ii)      the person is a party to a work agreement;

the name of the occupation and the corresponding 6-digit code (if any) as they are specified in the work agreement;

(d)the location or locations at which the nominated occupation is to be carried out.

(8B)The Minister is satisfied that the person has, in writing, certified as part of the nomination whether or not the person has engaged in conduct, in relation to the nomination, that constitutes a contravention of subsection 245AR(1) of the Act.;

(9)The Minister is satisfied that either:

(a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person or a person associated with the person; or

(b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person or a person associated with the person.

(10)If the person is a standard business sponsor — the Minister is satisfied that:

(a)if the nomination was made before 1 July 2010 - the nominated occupation corresponds to an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph; and

(aa)if the nomination is made on or after 1 July 2010 – the nominated occupation and its corresponding 6-digit code correspond to an occupation and its corresponding 6-digit code specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph and the occupation is applicable to the person identified in the nomination in accordance with the specification of the occupation; and

(b)if required by the instrument mentioned in paragraph (a)  or (aa) — the nomination of an occupation mentioned in the instrument is supported, in writing to the Minister, by an organisation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph; and

(c)the terms and conditions of employment of the person identified in the nomination will be no less favourable than the terms and conditions (including, if applicable, the terms and conditions provided by an enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009) that are provided or would be provided to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident for performing equivalent work at the same location; and

(cc)the base rate of pay, under the terms and conditions of employment mentioned in paragraph (c), that:

(i)       are provided; or

(ii)      would be provided;

to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident, will be greater than the temporary skilled migration income threshold specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph; and

(d)if the nomination was made before 1 July 2010 - the person has certified as part of the nomination, in writing, that:

(i)       the tasks of the position include a significant majority of the tasks of:

(A)the nominated occupation listed in the ASCO; or

(B)the nominated occupation specified in an instrument in writing for paragraph (a); and

(ii)      if the person is lawfully operating a business outside Australia but does not lawfully operate a business in Australia:

(A)the nominated occupation is a position in the business of the standard business sponsor; or

(B)the nominated occupation is an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-paragraph; and

(iii)     if the person lawfully operates a business in Australia:

(A)the nominated occupation is a position with a business, or an associated entity, of the person; or

(B)the nominated occupation is an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-paragraph; and

(iv)     the qualifications and experience of the visa holder, or the applicant or proposed applicant for the visa, identified in relation to the nominated occupation are commensurate with the qualifications and experience specified:

(A)for the occupation in the ASCO; or

(B)if there is no ASCO code for the nominated occupation — for the occupation in the instrument in writing made for the purpose of paragraph (a); and

(e)if the nomination is made on or after 1 July 2010 – the person has certified as part of the nomination, in writing, that:

(i)       the tasks of the position include a significant majority of the tasks of:

(A)the nominated occupation listed in the ANZSCO; or

(B)the nominated occupation specified in an instrument in writing for paragraph (aa); and

(ii)      if the person is lawfully operating a business outside Australia but does not lawfully operate a business in Australia:

(A)the nominated occupation is a position in the business of the standard business sponsor; or

(B)the nominated occupation is an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph; and

(iii)     if the person lawfully operates a business in Australia:

(A)the nominated occupation is a position with a business, or an associated entity, of the person; or

(B)the nominated occupation is an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph; and

(iv)     the qualifications and experience of the visa holder, or the applicant or proposed applicant for the visa, identified in relation to the nominated occupation are commensurate with the qualifications and experience specified:

(A)for the occupation in the ANZSCO; or

(B)if there is no ANZSCO code for the nominated occupation - for the occupation in the instrument in writing made for paragraph (aa).

(f)the position associated with the nominated occupation is genuine; and

(g)if the person has identified in the nomination the holder of a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa in relation to whom the requirements in subclause 457.223(6) of Schedule 2 were met—one of the following applies:

(i)       the requirements in subclause 457.223(6) of Schedule 2 continue to be met;

(ii)      if:

(A)the holder would be required to hold a licence, registration or membership that is mandatory to perform the occupation nominated in relation to the holder; and

(B)in order to obtain the licence, registration or membership, the holder would need to demonstrate that the holder has undertaken a language test specified by the Minister under subparagraph 457.223(4)(eb)(iv) of Schedule 2 and achieved a score that is better than the score specified for the test by the Minister under subparagraph 457.223(4)(eb)(v) of Schedule 2;

the holder demonstrates that he or she has proficiency in English of at least the standard required for the grant (however described) of the licence, registration or membership;

(iii)     the holder is an exempt applicant within the meaning of subclause 457.223(4) of Schedule 2;

(iv)     unless subparagraph (ii) applies—the holder:

(A)has undertaken a language test specified by the Minister under subparagraph 457.223(4)(eb)(iv) of Schedule 2; and

(B)achieved within the period specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument for this subparagraph, in a single attempt at the test, the score specified by the Minister under subparagraph 457.223(4)(eb)(v) of Schedule 2; and

(h)either:

(i)       the person will:

(A)engage the visa holder, the applicant for a visa or the proposed applicant for  a Subclass 457(Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa only as an employee under a written contract of employment; and

(B)give a copy of that contract to the Minister; or

(ii)      the nominated occupation is an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for sub-subparagraph (e)(iii)(B).

(10AA)For paragraphs (10) (c) and (cc), if no Australian citizen or Australian permanent resident performs equivalent work in the person’s workplace at the same location, the person must determine, using the method specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this subregulation:

(a)the terms and conditions of employment; and

(b)the base rate of pay, under the terms and conditions of employment;

that would be provided to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident to perform equivalent work in the person’s workplace at the same location.

(10AB)Paragraphs (10) (c) and (cc) do not apply if the annual earnings of the person identified in the nomination are equal to or greater than the amount specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this subregulation.

(10A)The Minister may disregard the criterion in paragraph (10) (cc) for the purpose of subregulation (2) if:

(a)the base rate of pay will not be greater than the temporary skilled migration income threshold specified for that paragraph; and

(b)the annual earnings are equal to or greater than the temporary skilled migration income threshold; and

(c)the Minister considers it reasonable to do so.

(11)If the person is a party to a work agreement (other than a Minister) — the Minister is satisfied that:

(a)the nominated occupation is specified in the work agreement as an occupation that the person may nominate; and

(b)if the nomination was made before 1 July 2010 - the person has certified as part of the nomination, in writing, that:

(i)       the tasks of the position include a significant majority of the tasks of:

(A)if the nomination is made using an ASCO code - the nominated occupation listed in the ASCO; or

(B)if the nomination is not made using an ASCO code - the nominated occupation specified in the work agreement; and

(ii)      the qualifications and experience of the visa holder, or the applicant or proposed applicant for the visa, identified in relation to the nominated occupation are commensurate with the qualifications and experience specified for the occupation in the work agreement; and

(c)if the nomination is made on or after 1 July 2010 - the person has certified as part of the nomination, in writing, that:

(i)       the tasks of the position include a significant majority of the tasks of:

(A)if the nomination is made using an ANZSCO code - the nominated occupation listed in the ANZSCO; or

(B)if the nomination is not made using an ANZSCO code - the nominated occupation specified in the work agreement; and

(ii)      the qualifications and experience of the visa holder, or the applicant or proposed applicant for the visa, identified in relation to the nominated occupation are commensurate with the qualifications and experience specified for the occupation in the work agreement.

(12)If the person is a party to a work agreement and the work agreement specifies requirements that must be met by the party to the work agreement — the Minister is satisfied that the requirements of the work agreement have been met.