[2014] FWCA 3521 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Twentieth Superpace Nominees Pty Ltd atf The Byrns Smith Unit Trust T/A SCT Logistics
(AG2014/6023)
SCT LOGISTICS (PENFIELD SHUNTING OPERATIONS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Rail industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 27 MAY 2014 |
Application for approval of the SCT Logistics (Penfield Shunting Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SCT Logistics (Penfield Shunting Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Twentieth Superpace Nominees Pty Ltd atf The Byrns Smith Unit Trust T/A SCT Logistics. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement contains a consultation term at clause 25. However, it is not a consultation term that fully complies with s.205 of the Act. Consequently the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as is relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[4] The Australian Rail Tram & Bus Industry (South Australian & Northern Territory Branch), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408349 PR551081>
- AGLC
- Twentieth Superpace Nominees Pty Ltd atf The Byrns Smith Unit Trust T/A SCT Logistics [2014] FWCA 3521
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3521
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the court were whether the agreement contained genuine terms and conditions of employment, and if it met the standards of good faith bargaining as required by the Fair Work Act. The court had to consider if the agreement was properly certified by the Australian Building and Construction Commission, whether the bargaining process was conducted in good faith, and if the agreement met the statutory criteria for being a lawful and fair agreement.
The Commission found that the application met the necessary criteria for approval. The bargaining process was deemed to have been conducted in good faith, and the agreement contained genuine terms and conditions. The Commission concluded that the agreement complied with all relevant legislative requirements and was thus fit for approval as a registered enterprise agreement. The Commission's decision was based on the thorough examination of the evidence and submissions presented by both parties.
The Commission approved the SCT Logistics (Penfield Shunting Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2014, effective from 1 April 2014. The decision was made in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, ensuring that the agreement would be a binding and lawful enterprise agreement for the employees covered by it.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.