| [2019] FWCA 4827 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
TW Power Services Pty Limited
(AG2019/2246)
TW POWER SERVICES AGL LOY YANG STATION MECHANICAL (AMWU & CFMEU) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 10 JULY 2019 |
Application for approval of the TW Power Services AGL Loy Yang Station Mechanical (AMWU & CFMEU) Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TW Power Services AGL Loy Yang Station Mechanical (AMWU & CFMEU) Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by TW Power Services Pty Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) and the Australian Manufacturing and Workers Union (AMWU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 10.10 - Termination,
• Clause 23.1.5 - Public Holidays and;
• Clause 23.9.7 - Personal/Carers Leave.
However, noting clause 6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 July 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE504394 PR710222>
- AGLC
- TW Power Services Pty Limited [2019] FWCA 4827
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 4827
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court needed to resolve included whether the agreement process was conducted with procedural fairness and whether the terms of the agreement were fair. Procedural fairness involved verifying that the parties were given adequate opportunity to participate in the negotiation process. The fairness of the terms required scrutiny to ensure they were reasonable, equitable, and not oppressive to either party.
The Fair Work Commission found the agreement process was procedurally fair, as the parties had ample opportunity to participate in negotiations. Regarding the fairness of the terms, the Commission considered several factors, including the need to balance the interests of both parties, the context of the industry, and the economic realities faced by the employer. The Commission concluded that, overall, the agreement was fair and approved it. The decision was based on the understanding that the terms, while potentially onerous for employees, were necessary to maintain the economic viability of the employer and were not oppressive.
The final orders included the approval of the enterprise agreement and the setting aside of the respondents' opposition to the application. This decision underscores the importance of procedural fairness in the negotiation process and the balancing act required in assessing the fairness of enterprise agreement terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.