| [2016] FWCA 2555 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
TW Power Services
(AG2016/695)
TW POWER SERVICES AGL LOY YANG STATION MECHANICAL (AMWU & CFMEU) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 21 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the TW Power Services AGL Loy Yang Station Mechanical (AMWU & CFMEU) Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TW Power Services AGL Loy Yang Station Mechanical (AMWU & CFMEU) Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by TW Power Services. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being the bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE418675 PR579368>
- AGLC
- TW Power Services [2016] FWCA 2555
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2555
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to resolve included whether the agreement was genuinely a product of bargaining, whether it complied with the Fair Work Act, and whether it contained all the required terms and conditions as stipulated by the legislation. In addition, the court needed to assess if the agreement met the "better off overall test" as it pertained to the employees' entitlements and protections.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the process through which the agreement was negotiated and concluded that it was genuinely the product of free collective bargaining. The court found that the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work Act and met all the legislative requirements, including the "better off overall test." The Commission took into account the submissions from both parties and the evidence provided, which demonstrated that the proposed agreement improved the employees' terms and conditions compared to the expired agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, noting that it would enhance the employees' overall situation and ensure fair and equitable treatment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.