TSILIVIS -v- GORDON [2007] WADC 111
| DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2007] WADC 111 | |
| Case No: | CIV:1309/2006 | 5-6 JUNE 2007 | |
| Coram: | COMMISSIONER STEVENSON | 3/07/07 | |
| PERTH | |||
| 50 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Damages assessed in the sum of $20,000 | ||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | IRENE TSILIVIS ANDREW MAURICE GORDON |
Catchwords: | Damages Negligence Motor vehicle accident Personal injuries Assessment of damages Mild soft tissue strain injury to cervical spine Headaches Preexisting rheumatoid arthritis Preexisting recurrent headaches 45yearold working woman |
Legislation: | Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Amendment Act 1994, s 3C |
Case References: | Den Hoedt & Anor v Barwick [2006] WASCA 196 Southgate v Waterford (1990) 21 NSWLR 427 |
JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CIVIL
- Plaintiff
AND
ANDREW MAURICE GORDON
Defendant
Catchwords:
Damages - Negligence - Motor vehicle accident - Personal injuries - Assessment of damages - Mild soft tissue strain injury to cervical spine - Headaches - Preexisting rheumatoid arthritis - Preexisting recurrent headaches - 45yearold working woman
Legislation:
Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Amendment Act 1994, s 3C
Result:
Damages assessed in the sum of $20,000
(Page 2)
Representation:
Counsel:
Plaintiff : Mr T Lampropoulos
Defendant : Ms B A Mangan
Solicitors:
Plaintiff : Simon Walters
Defendant : Lavan Legal
Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):
Den Hoedt & Anor v Barwick [2006] WASCA 196
Southgate v Waterford (1990) 21 NSWLR 427
(Page 3)
- COMMISSIONER STEVENSON:
Introduction
1 The plaintiff was born in Greece on 25 April 1962 and is 45 years of age. On 10 April 2005 the plaintiff was injured when the motor vehicle she was driving on Wanneroo Road, Balcatta was "rear-ended" by a vehicle being driven by the defendant. The defendant has admitted liability for the accident. The matter comes on before me for an assessment of damages.
The circumstances of the accident
2 The plaintiff was driving her daughter's motor vehicle, a Mitsubishi Mirage sedan, on Wanneroo Road, Balcatta on Sunday 10 April 2005 at about 4.15 pm. She saw two vehicles in front of her which started to brake because the driver of the front vehicle had decided to do a U-turn. The plaintiff said she put her brakes on and looked in the rear vision mirror. She realised the vehicle behind was going to hit her vehicle so she "grabbed the steering wheel and just hoped for the best". As a result of the collision the plaintiff's vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front so they "just touched". The plaintiff suffered an injury on her head, which she described as a "scratch". She told those present she did not require an ambulance and was given a lift home. The plaintiff's vehicle was towed away because she was told it was not driveable. Subsequently the insurers…
Continue reading Tsilivis v Gordon
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Tsilivis v Gordon [2007] WADC 111
- Case
- [2007] WADC 111
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the motor vehicle accident materially contributed to the plaintiff's injuries, and if so, to what extent the pre-existing conditions affected the assessment of damages. The court had to consider the degree to which the accident exacerbated the plaintiff's existing conditions and the impact of the injuries on her life.
The court found that the motor vehicle accident did contribute to the plaintiff's injuries. However, it also acknowledged the presence of the pre-existing conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis and recurrent headaches, which predated the accident. The court assessed the plaintiff's damages taking into account the exacerbation of her pre-existing conditions and the overall impact of the injuries on her life, including the need for ongoing medical treatment and the effect on her ability to work. The court determined that the appropriate amount of damages to be awarded was $20,000.
The court ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff damages in the sum of $20,000. The judgment detailed the considerations that led to this assessment, ensuring clarity for both parties regarding the basis of the award.
Orders
Orders of the court
Damages assessed in the sum of $20,000
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.