Tsilivis v Gordon

Case [2007] WADC 111


TSILIVIS -v- GORDON [2007] WADC 111



DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2007] WADC 111
Case No:CIV:1309/20065-6 JUNE 2007
Coram:COMMISSIONER STEVENSON3/07/07
PERTH
50Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Damages assessed in the sum of $20,000
PDF Version
Parties:IRENE TSILIVIS
ANDREW MAURICE GORDON

Catchwords:

Damages
Negligence
Motor vehicle accident
Personal injuries
Assessment of damages
Mild soft tissue strain injury to cervical spine
Headaches
Pre­existing rheumatoid arthritis
Pre­existing recurrent headaches
45­year­old working woman

Legislation:

Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Amendment Act 1994, s 3C

Case References:

Den Hoedt & Anor v Barwick [2006] WASCA 196
Southgate v Waterford (1990) 21 NSWLR 427


JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CIVIL
LOCATION : PERTH CITATION : TSILIVIS -v- GORDON [2007] WADC 111 CORAM : COMMISSIONER STEVENSON HEARD : 5-6 JUNE 2007 DELIVERED : 3 JULY 2007 FILE NO/S : CIV 1309 of 2006 BETWEEN : IRENE TSILIVIS
    Plaintiff

    AND

    ANDREW MAURICE GORDON
    Defendant

Catchwords:

Damages - Negligence - Motor vehicle accident - Personal injuries - Assessment of damages - Mild soft tissue strain injury to cervical spine - Headaches - Pre­existing rheumatoid arthritis - Pre­existing recurrent headaches - 45­year­old working woman

Legislation:

Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Amendment Act 1994, s 3C

Result:

Damages assessed in the sum of $20,000



(Page 2)

Representation:

Counsel:


    Plaintiff : Mr T Lampropoulos
    Defendant : Ms B A Mangan

Solicitors:

    Plaintiff : Simon Walters
    Defendant : Lavan Legal


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Den Hoedt & Anor v Barwick [2006] WASCA 196
Southgate v Waterford (1990) 21 NSWLR 427

(Page 3)
    COMMISSIONER STEVENSON:


Introduction

1 The plaintiff was born in Greece on 25 April 1962 and is 45 years of age. On 10 April 2005 the plaintiff was injured when the motor vehicle she was driving on Wanneroo Road, Balcatta was "rear-ended" by a vehicle being driven by the defendant. The defendant has admitted liability for the accident. The matter comes on before me for an assessment of damages.




The circumstances of the accident

2 The plaintiff was driving her daughter's motor vehicle, a Mitsubishi Mirage sedan, on Wanneroo Road, Balcatta on Sunday 10 April 2005 at about 4.15 pm. She saw two vehicles in front of her which started to brake because the driver of the front vehicle had decided to do a U-turn. The plaintiff said she put her brakes on and looked in the rear vision mirror. She realised the vehicle behind was going to hit her vehicle so she "grabbed the steering wheel and just hoped for the best". As a result of the collision the plaintiff's vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front so they "just touched". The plaintiff suffered an injury on her head, which she described as a "scratch". She told those present she did not require an ambulance and was given a lift home. The plaintiff's vehicle was towed away because she was told it was not driveable. Subsequently the insurers…

Continue reading Tsilivis v Gordon

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Tsilivis v Gordon [2007] WADC 111
Case
[2007] WADC 111
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Tsilivis v Gordon, the plaintiff, a 45-year-old working woman, claimed damages from the defendant for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff alleged she suffered a mild soft tissue strain to her cervical spine and experienced headaches. The plaintiff also had pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis and recurrent headaches prior to the accident. The matter was heard and determined by the Supreme Court of Queensland.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the motor vehicle accident materially contributed to the plaintiff's injuries, and if so, to what extent the pre-existing conditions affected the assessment of damages. The court had to consider the degree to which the accident exacerbated the plaintiff's existing conditions and the impact of the injuries on her life.

The court found that the motor vehicle accident did contribute to the plaintiff's injuries. However, it also acknowledged the presence of the pre-existing conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis and recurrent headaches, which predated the accident. The court assessed the plaintiff's damages taking into account the exacerbation of her pre-existing conditions and the overall impact of the injuries on her life, including the need for ongoing medical treatment and the effect on her ability to work. The court determined that the appropriate amount of damages to be awarded was $20,000.

The court ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff damages in the sum of $20,000. The judgment detailed the considerations that led to this assessment, ensuring clarity for both parties regarding the basis of the award.

Orders

Orders of the court

Damages assessed in the sum of $20,000

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.