Tsekouras v Olsen

Case

[2006] HCATrans 174

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2006] HCATrans 174

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S545 of 2005

B e t w e e n -

CON TSEKOURAS

Applicant

and

PETER OLSEN

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 11 APRIL 2006, AT 2.00 PM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HAYNE J:   The applicant seeks special leave to appeal against the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.  By those orders, Mason P and Giles JA refused to grant leave to appeal against orders of Adams J, who dismissed the applicant’s appeal from a decision of Master Harrison.

The respondent had filed a notice of motion on 8 February 2005 seeking an order that certain proceedings commenced in the Supreme Court of New South Wales by the applicant against the respondent be dismissed summarily as disclosing no reasonable cause of action, being frivolous, an abuse of process or embarrassing.  Master Harrison accepted that the applicant’s cause of action arose from the administration of his bankruptcy and that the Federal Court had exclusive jurisdiction in such matters.  Accordingly, he concluded that the proceedings were incompetent and, in any event, the claim as pleaded was hopeless and should be dismissed.  The Court of Appeal held that the Master was correct to dismiss the claim and refused leave to appeal.

Because the applicant is unrepresented, the application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

The applicant’s written submissions in support of the application for special leave do not advance any questions of law which would warrant the grant of special leave.  We see no reason to doubt the correctness of the conclusions reached in the courts below.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.

AT 2.02 PM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Negligence & Tort

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Causation

  • Damages

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

  • Reliance

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0