Trotter v Giles

Case

[1995] HCATrans 37

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Adelaide  No A32 of 1994

B e t w e e n -

ANTHONY ROBERT TROTTER

Applicant

and

HUGH GILES and THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Respondents

Publication of decision

BRENNAN J
DAWSON J
GAUDRON J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 7 MARCH 1995, AT 10.18 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

BRENNAN J:   This application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia was considered by myself and by Justices Dawson and Gaudron.  There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the trial judge or the decision of the Full Court dismissing the applicant’s action for wrongful arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution.  Nor is there any foundation for the submission of bias on the part of the learned trial judge and a member of the Full Court.  The Court is of the opinion that the application for special leave should be dismissed.  I publish the grounds of decision.

AT 10.19 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Negligence & Tort

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Causation

  • Damages

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

  • Reliance

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0