Tricon Services Group Pty Limited v Manly Council (No 2)
Case
•
[2011] NSWLEC 253
•16 December 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Tricon Services Group Pty Limited v Manly Council (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 253
[2011] NSWLEC 253
16 December 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Tricon Services Group Pty Limited appealed against a decision of the Commissioner of the Valuer General, who found that the property owned by Tricon was not exempt from the valuation and land tax. The property was used for the purposes of the Council’s business and therefore subject to the valuation and land tax. Tricon contended that it had a statutory exemption under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) and therefore its property should not be subject to valuation and land tax. The court was required to determine whether Tricon’s property was exempt from the valuation and land tax.
The court found that the exemption was only applicable to the extent that the land was used for the purposes of the council’s business and that the exemption was not applicable to any part of the property that was not used for the purposes of the council’s business. The court held that the Commissioner had erred in his determination by not considering the exemption in the correct manner. The court found that the exemption applied to the whole of the property and that the property was therefore exempt from the valuation and land tax. The court set aside the decision of the Commissioner and remitted the matter back to the Commissioner for determination in accordance with the court’s decision. The court also ordered that the respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the appeal and that the respondent is to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 with respect to the costs of the appeal, if otherwise qualified.
The court found that the exemption was only applicable to the extent that the land was used for the purposes of the council’s business and that the exemption was not applicable to any part of the property that was not used for the purposes of the council’s business. The court held that the Commissioner had erred in his determination by not considering the exemption in the correct manner. The court found that the exemption applied to the whole of the property and that the property was therefore exempt from the valuation and land tax. The court set aside the decision of the Commissioner and remitted the matter back to the Commissioner for determination in accordance with the court’s decision. The court also ordered that the respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the appeal and that the respondent is to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 with respect to the costs of the appeal, if otherwise qualified.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Remand
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Madss Properties No 2 Pty Ltd ATF Newtown Property Trust v Blacktown City Council (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 126
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Madss Properties No 2 Pty Ltd ATF Newtown Property Trust (No 2) v Blacktown City Council
[2019] NSWLEC 126
Council of the City of Sydney v Base Backpackers Pty Ltd
[2015] NSWLEC 63
SJ Connelly CPP Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council
[2014] NSWLEC 2
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
3
Tricon Services Group Pty Limited v Manly Council
[2011] NSWLEC 1271
Edyp v Brazbuild Pty Ltd
[2011] NSWCA 218
Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd
[2010] HCA 32