| [2025] FWCA 3310 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Trevi Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2025/3230)
TREVI AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) SUBCONTRACTORS PILING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 - 2027
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 1 OCTOBER 2025 |
Application for approval of the Trevi Australia Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Piling Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Trevi Australia Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Piling Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Trevi Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 October 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2027.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE530639 PR792293>
- AGLC
- Trevi Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 3310
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 3310
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the "better off overall test" which requires that employees be no worse off financially under the new agreement than they would be under their existing awards or agreements. The Commission also examined the fairness of the agreement's terms and conditions, including whether they provided for adequate protections for employees. After considering the submissions from both parties and the evidence presented, the Commission found that the proposed agreement did meet the statutory requirements and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
The Commission's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the evidence and submissions, and its conclusion that the agreement was fair and reasonable. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a number of benefits for employees, including wage increases and improved conditions of employment. The Commission also found that the agreement met the "better off overall test" and provided for adequate protections for employees. The final orders of the Commission were that the proposed agreement be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. The agreement will now come into effect on the date specified in the approval order.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.