Trent & Trent (No 2)

Case

[2015] FamCA 1058

27 November 2015


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

TRENT & TRENT (NO 2) [2015] FamCA 1058
APPLICANT: Ms Trent
RESPONDENT: Mr Trent
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Independent Children’s Lawyer
FILE NUMBER: SYC 5653 of 2013
DATE DELIVERED: 27 November 2015
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Rees J
HEARING DATE: 24 – 29 September 2015

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Johnston
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Santone Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Geddes SC
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mills Oakley Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Ms Conte-Mills
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Phillip A Wilkins & Associates

Orders

IT IS ORDERED

  1. That each of the husband and the wife, within one month of the date hereof, pay to the Legal Aid Commission of NSW the sum of $6,789.50 on account of the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer.

  2. That each of the husband and the wife forthwith pay to Dr E the sum of $1,897.50 being the costs of his attendance for cross-examination.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Trent & Trent has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: SYC 5653  of 2013

Ms Trent

Applicant

And

Mr Trent

Respondent

SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. Judgement in this matter was delivered on 23 October 2015.

  2. At the conclusion of the parenting proceedings, the Independent Children’s Lawyer (“ICL”) sought an order that the parents contribute equally to the costs of the ICL and to the costs charged by the single expert, Dr E, for his attendance for cross-examination. That application was not addressed in the substantive judgement.

  3. The costs of the ICL were assessed as $13,579.50 and the costs of Dr E were $3,785.

  4. Neither party queried the quantum of costs and neither resisted an order that they should equally pay those costs.

  5. Accordingly, orders will be made as sought by the ICL.

I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Rees delivered on 27 November 2015.

Associate:

Date:  27/11/2015

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0