Trent & Trent (No 2)
[2015] FamCA 1058
•27 November 2015
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| TRENT & TRENT (NO 2) | [2015] FamCA 1058 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Trent |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Trent |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Independent Children’s Lawyer |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 5653 | of | 2013 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 27 November 2015 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Rees J |
| HEARING DATE: | 24 – 29 September 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Johnston |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Santone Lawyers |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Geddes SC |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mills Oakley Lawyers |
| COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Conte-Mills |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Phillip A Wilkins & Associates |
Orders
IT IS ORDERED
That each of the husband and the wife, within one month of the date hereof, pay to the Legal Aid Commission of NSW the sum of $6,789.50 on account of the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer.
That each of the husband and the wife forthwith pay to Dr E the sum of $1,897.50 being the costs of his attendance for cross-examination.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Trent & Trent has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
FILE NUMBER: SYC 5653 of 2013
| Ms Trent |
Applicant
And
| Mr Trent |
Respondent
SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Judgement in this matter was delivered on 23 October 2015.
At the conclusion of the parenting proceedings, the Independent Children’s Lawyer (“ICL”) sought an order that the parents contribute equally to the costs of the ICL and to the costs charged by the single expert, Dr E, for his attendance for cross-examination. That application was not addressed in the substantive judgement.
The costs of the ICL were assessed as $13,579.50 and the costs of Dr E were $3,785.
Neither party queried the quantum of costs and neither resisted an order that they should equally pay those costs.
Accordingly, orders will be made as sought by the ICL.
I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Rees delivered on 27 November 2015.
Associate:
Date: 27/11/2015
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
0
0
0