Trent Pennell v Western Star Concrete Pty Ltd
[2015] FWC 8255
•17 DECEMBER 2015
| [2015] FWC 8255 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Trent Pennell
v
Western Star Concrete Pty Ltd
(U2015/10864)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY | MELBOURNE, 17 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for relief from unfair dismissal.
[1] On 6 August 2015, Mr Trent Pennell made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] Mr Pennell did not pay the required fee.
[3] On 12 August 2015, Mr Pennell was asked by email correspondence to contact the Fair Work Commission.
[4] On 19 August 2015, Mr Pennell was advised by email correspondence that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with his application.
[5] Section 395, which deals with application fees, provides:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
[6] On 24 August 2015, the Commission telephoned Mr Pennell and left a voicemail message requesting he contact the Commission.
[7] On 2 September 2015, 10 September 2015, 14 October 2015 and 2 December 2015, the Commission again attempted to telephone Mr Pennell with no success.
[8] On 2 December 2015, the Commission forwarded email correspondence to Mr Pennell advising his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with his application. He was also advised that in the absence of any advice being received from him within 14 days, his application may be dismissed.
[9] No response was received from Mr Pennell and payment of the required fee has not been made.
[10] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
[11] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Act, the application was not made in accordance with the Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR574524>
0
0
0