Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trend Living Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1215 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 4 May 2018 Date of orders: 04 May 2018 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [5] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Trend Living Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant)
S Patterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/135399 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This in application by Trend Living Pty Ltd against the deemed refusal by Northern Beaches Council pursuant to Section 97(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, to grant consent to Development Application number DA2017/0256 for excavation works and the construction of a mixed use building containing self-storage units and industrial warehouse units in relation to Lot 27 in Deposited Plan 28882 and Lot 9 in Deposited Plan 201553 being 69 Middleton Road & 6 Villiers Place, Cromer.
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend their development application in accordance with the plans referred to in Condition 1 a) of Annexure "A".
The Appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. DA2017/0256 for excavation works and construction of a mixed use building containing self-storage units and industrial warehouse units at 69 Middleton Road and 6 Villiers Place, Cromer is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure "A" to this agreement.
The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs arising under s8.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount as agreed or assessed.
……………………….
D M Dickson
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (140 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Trend Living Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1215
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1215
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the council acted within its statutory powers and followed the correct procedure when making its decision. It also considered whether the council had taken into account all relevant matters and whether the decision was irrational. The key legal issue was whether the council's decision to refuse development consent was legally sound.
The court found that the council's decision was lawful and based on relevant considerations. It held that the council had acted within its statutory powers and followed the correct procedure. The court also found that the council had considered all relevant matters and that the decision was rational. The court dismissed the application for judicial review.
The court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings. The court held that the respondent was entitled to costs as the applicant's application for judicial review had no reasonable prospect of success. The court also ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of any further proceedings arising from the application for judicial review.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [5] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.