TRCH and National Disability Insurance Agency [2024] AATA 2918 (15 August 2024)
Division:NATIONAL DISABILITY INSURANCE SCHEME DIVISION
File Number(s): 2021/9125
Re:TRCH
APPLICANT
AndNational Disability Insurance Agency
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Tribunal:Member T Bubutievski
Date:15 August 2024
Place:Sydney
The internal review decision of 25 October 2021 made under subsection 100(6) of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth), which confirmed the reviewable decision of 27 August 2021, is set aside and remitted for reconsideration with directions that:
a.the following reasonable and necessary support will be funded under the National Disability Insurance Scheme from 27 August 2021:
(i)18 hours per annum of exercise physiology (including provider travel);
(ii)75 hours per annum of speech pathology (including provider travel);
(iii)48 hours per annum of occupational therapy (including provider travel);
(iv)Support work:
(a)two hours daily, seven days per week, of support for personal care and activities of daily living at the ratio of 1:1 (14 hours per week);
(b)three hours per week at weekday rates of support for social, community and civic participation at the ratio of 1:1;
(c)one hour per week at weekday rates of therapy support at the ratio of 1:1;
(d)20 hours per annum of support work at the ratio of 1:1 to assist in the transition to holiday care and STA;
(v)18 hours per week for 12 weeks per annum of holiday care at the ratio of 1:3;
(vi)12 days per annum of STA at the ratio of 1:4;
(vii)Transport funding at current NDIS Pricing Arrangements for SCCP and support worker attendance at therapy appointments once per month;
(viii)$500 per annum for low-cost assistive technology.
b.The date by which the Respondent will reassess the Applicant’s plan is 12 months from the date on which the supports under paragraph (a) are included in the Applicant’s existing statement of participant supports (the reassessment date).
c.All other reasonable and necessary supports in the existing statement of participant supports, not funded under paragraph (a), excluding any one-off assistive technology already funded, shall be replicated for a period of 12 months, from the date on which the supports under paragraph (a) are included in the Applicant’s existing statement of participant supports until the reassessment date.
d.The Respondent is to determine the appropriate mechanism for the reimbursement or payment of support work invoices.
............................[SGD]............................................
Member T Bubutievski
CATCHWORDS
NATIONAL DISABILITY INSURANCE SCHEME – review of decision relating to approval of Applicant’s statement of participant supports (SOPS) under his NDIS plan – child participant has autism (level 3), severe intellectual disability, sensory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder – request for additional funding for allied health interventions, support worker assistance, feeding program and travel – whether “reasonable and necessary supports” criteria under s 34(1) of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth) (NDIS Act) are met – Tribunal satisfied that some requested supports meet those criteria and should be included in Applicant’s SOPS – payment of outstanding invoices - Decision Under Review set aside and remitted with direction to facilitate…
Continue reading TRCH and National Disability Insurance Agency
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- TRCH and National Disability Insurance Agency [2024] AATA 2918
- Case
- [2024] AATA 2918
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the supports requested by Ms TRCH, including extensive allied health services, behaviour intervention, and support worker assistance, satisfied the "reasonable and necessary" criteria as defined by the NDIS Act. Specifically, the Tribunal had to assess if these supports were value for money and effective and beneficial for TRCH, considering his complex disability profile and the stated aim of enhancing his opportunities and assisting with daily activities.
The Tribunal found that some of the requested supports did indeed meet the "reasonable and necessary" criteria and should be included in TRCH's SOPS. The Tribunal's reasoning led to the setting aside of the NDIA's Decision Under Review and a remittal with directions to facilitate the approval of a new SOPS for TRCH. Subsequent NDIS plans, approved on 19 April 2024 and 18 July 2024 following remittal, incorporated some of the changes sought by Ms TRCH, reflecting an increase in funding for core supports, social, community and civic participation, capacity building through allied health, and specialist behaviour management.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.