Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 2827


[2024] FWC 2827

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Transport Workers' Union of Australia
v

Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

(B2024/1318)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 10 OCTOBER 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (Ventia or Employer).

  1. On 10 October 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Kim Scarlett, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the TWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Ventia, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 24 October 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR780129.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR780130>

Details
AGLC
Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 2827
Case
[2024] FWC 2827
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The employer, Ventia, did not object to the application, allowing the Commission to decide the matter on the papers without a hearing.

The Commission had to determine if the requirements for a protected action ballot were met under section 443(1) of the Act. The TWU provided a declaration from Kim Scarlett, an Organiser, outlining the steps taken in bargaining with Ventia. The declaration affirmed that the TWU had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement. The Commission was also satisfied that the notification time for the proposed agreement had been met and that all conditions were fulfilled for the ballot to proceed.

Upon reviewing the submitted material, Deputy President Hampton determined that the date for closing the ballot would be 24 October 2024. This date established the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent, was authorised to conduct the ballot. The matter will be assigned to another member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A. The member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives and may issue Directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.

This decision sets out the procedural requirements and timeline for the proposed protected action ballot. The Commission's determination ensures that the ballot will proceed in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.