| [2017] FWC 949 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.739 - Application to deal with a dispute
Transport Workers' Union of Australia
v
Q Catering Limited
(C2015/7093)
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 22 FEBRUARY 2017 |
Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the NES;[s186(6)].
[1] Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2] An Order [PR590291] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR590290>
- AGLC
- Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Q Catering Limited [2017] FWC 949
- Case
- [2017] FWC 949
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues at the heart of this case centred on whether the alleged matters were genuinely connected to the enterprise agreement or the NES. The commission had to determine if the dispute fell within the scope of what could be addressed under section 186(6) of the Fair Work Act. The central question was whether the dispute was about any matters arising under the enterprise agreement or the NES, or if it was about something else entirely.
In its decision, the commission carefully examined the nature of the dispute and the specific provisions of the enterprise agreement and the NES. It considered whether the issues raised by the union were genuinely related to these documents or if they were extraneous matters. After thorough analysis, the commission concluded that the dispute did not pertain to any matters arising under the enterprise agreement or the NES. Consequently, the commission dismissed the application on the basis that it did not fall within its jurisdiction under the specified sections of the Fair Work Act.
The final orders of the commission were that the application be dismissed and that each party bear their own costs of the proceedings. This decision underscored the importance of ensuring that disputes genuinely relate to the terms of the enterprise agreement or the NES before being brought before the commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.