Transport Workers' Union of Australia v GTS Freight Management Pty Ltd
[2012] FWA 8175
•21 SEPTEMBER 2012
[2012] FWA 8175 |
|
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.236—Majority support determination
Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
v
GTS Freight Management Pty Ltd
(B2012/1422)
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 21 SEPTEMBER 2012 |
Application for majority support determination - GTS Freight Management Pty Ltd - ballot of employees conducted by AEC - results declared - application dismissed
[1] On 25 July 2012, the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) made application to Fair Work Australia for a majority support determination. The Respondent is GTS Freight Management Pty Ltd (the Respondent). The application was made pursuant to section 236 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The matter was heard before me on 1 August 2012. After hearing submissions and evidence from both parties, I delivered an ex tempore decision in which I ordered the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) to hold a ballot of affected employees to determine whether there is majority support to bargain. An Order 1 for the ballot was issued on 3 August 2012, and my oral decision was subsequently published2 on 9 August 2012.
[3] On 27 August 2012, the Returning Officer from the Australian Electoral Commission declared the outcome of the ballot as follows;
Number of employees on the roll of voters | 115 |
Ballot papers admitted to scrutiny | 65 |
Number of voters wanting to bargain (Yes Votes) | 30 |
Number of voters not wanting to bargain (No Votes) | 34 |
Number of informal ballot papers | 1 |
[4] On 30 August 2012, I advised the parties that, on the basis of the declaration of results received from the AEC, I proposed to dismiss the application. I advised that I would list the matter for attendance hearing if either party sought to be heard further as to why I should not dismiss the application.
[5] On 31 August 2012, I received correspondence from the TWU requesting an attendance hearing, based on two grounds. I listed the matter for hearing before me on 24 September 2012.
[6] On 12 September 2012, I received correspondence from the Victorian Employers’ Chamber of Commerce and Industry on behalf of the Respondent, seeking that matter be heard on the papers.
[7] On 17 September 2012, I wrote to all parties, seeking further particulars from the TWU.
[8] Subsequent to this correspondence, the TWU withdrew their allegations in relation to the conduct of the ballot and sought that the file be closed.
[9] I am not satisfied that a majority of the affected employees wish to bargain for an enterprise agreement. The application for a majority support determination in this case is dismissed.
COMMISSIONER
1 PR527502
2 [2012] FWA 6677
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR529433>
0
1
0