| [2023] FWC 460 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
Transport Workers' Union of Australia
v
Giacci Bros Pty Ltd
(B2023/156)
| VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | SYDNEY, 24 FEBRUARY 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Giacci Bros Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Transport Workers' Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Giacci Bros Pty Ltd (Respondent).
On 24 February 2023, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Charles Nichols of the Applicant declared on 22 February 2023, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An Order and Directions have been separately issued in PR751139 and PR751142 respectively.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR751140>
- AGLC
- Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Giacci Bros Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 460
- Case
- [2023] FWC 460
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the Transport Workers' Union of Australia had met the requirements under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order. The Commission needed to consider whether the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Giacci Bros Pty Ltd, and whether a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had been met.
The Fair Work Commission found that the union had met the requirements for a protected action ballot order. The Vice President was satisfied that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Giacci Bros Pty Ltd, and that a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had been met. As a result, the Vice President determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
The Fair Work Commission issued an Order and Directions in PR751139 and PR751142 respectively. The decision is binding on both parties and the union may now proceed with the protected action ballot.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.