Transport Workers' Union of Australia v dnata Airport Services Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 3018


[2024] FWC 3018

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Transport Workers' Union of Australia
v

dnata Airport Services Pty Ltd

(B2024/1414)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 31 OCTOBER 2024

Proposed protected action ballot by employees of dnata Airport Services Pty Ltd 

  1. This is an application by the Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of dnata Airport Services Pty Ltd (dnata or Employer). 

  1. On 31 October 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Nadia Gubbay-Nemes, Legal Officer, setting out the steps taken by the TWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with dnata, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. 

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (FVS). FVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 28 November 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR780793.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. 

  1. The structure of the draft order has been amended to reflect the Fair Work Commission’s standard template.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 20 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR780794>

Details
AGLC
Transport Workers' Union of Australia v dnata Airport Services Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 3018
Case
[2024] FWC 3018
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of dnata Airport Services Pty Ltd (dnata). The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, and the FWC was to decide whether to allow the proposed ballot to proceed. The Employer, dnata, did not object to the application as amended, and the Deputy President, Wright, decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The legal issues the FWC had to resolve included whether the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer, whether all statutory requirements for a ballot had been met, and if the proposed ballot agent was eligible. The TWU provided a declaration from Nadia Gubbay-Nemes, Legal Officer, detailing the steps taken in bargaining with dnata and confirming the union's genuine efforts to reach an agreement. The FWC also needed to determine the closing date for voting, which was set at 28 November 2024.

The FWC was satisfied that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been met, including the notification time for the proposed agreement. Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (FVS) was approved as a ballot agent under section 468A of the Act, thus authorised to conduct the ballot. The Deputy President determined the closing date for voting as 28 November 2024, which also established the ballot period for section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter will be assigned to another FWC member for a compulsory conciliation conference, requiring the attendance of bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement. Directions will be issued to ensure meaningful negotiations occur at the conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.