Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 188


[2025] FWC 188

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Transport Workers' Union of Australia
v

Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd

(B2025/138)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 21 JANUARY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd (Cleanaway or Employer).

  1. On 20 January 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer objected to the Application on grounds related to one of the ballot questions set out in Clause 5 of the draft order.

  1. The parties continued constructive discussions and ultimately reached a common position on the above matter. In that light, I have granted leave to amend the application and otherwise dealt with the application on the papers.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Shane Pierpoint, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the TWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Cleanaway, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 11 February 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR783476.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 14 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the amended application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR783477>

Details
AGLC
Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 188
Case
[2025] FWC 188
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (TWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd. Cleanaway objected to the application, citing concerns about one of the ballot questions, but the parties reached an agreement during discussions. The Deputy President, Hampton, granted leave to amend the application and proceeded to address the matter based on the submitted documents, including a declaration by Shane Pierpoint, an organiser for the TWU, confirming the union's genuine efforts to reach an agreement with Cleanaway.

The key legal issues before the court were whether the notification time for the proposed agreement was valid and if all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. The Deputy President concluded that the notification time was valid and all conditions of section 443(1) were met based on the evidence provided. Additionally, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, the approved ballot agent, was authorised to conduct the ballot. The closing date for voting was set at 11 February 2025, which aligns with the requested 14 working days from the order's issuance.

The Deputy President issued an order and assigned the matter to another member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A. This member will require the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. The Deputy President also indicated that directions would likely be issued to ensure that the parties are prepared for meaningful negotiations. The final orders were issued in PR783476 and PR783477, and the matter was moved to another member for further proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.