Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 1623


[2025] FWC 1623

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Transport Workers' Union of Australia
v

Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd

(B2025/922)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 12 JUNE 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia acting through its WA branch (TWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd (Cleanaway or Employer).

  1. I note that The Australian Workers’ Union have made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement, which was granted.[1]

  1. On 12 June 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application, subject to there being an extended notice period of five (5) working days in relation to the proposed forms of industrial action. The TWU, in effect, accepted that there were the relevant exceptional circumstances and agreed to that amendment. I also observe that Cleanaway did clarify certain aspects of the prior negotiations which do not impact upon compliance with the statutory requirements to make the proposed order.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application and determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Alistair Ernest Gan-Son Outen, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the TWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Cleanaway, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 26 June 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of five (5) working days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR788134.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/905.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788135>

Details
AGLC
Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1623
Case
[2025] FWC 1623
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Transport Workers' Union of Australia, through its Western Australian branch, applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 in relation to certain employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd. The Australian Workers' Union had already made a separate application for a protected action ballot order concerning the same proposed agreement, which was granted. The employer did not object to the application, subject to an extended notice period of five working days for the proposed forms of industrial action. The TWU accepted the amendment, and the employer clarified certain aspects of prior negotiations. The Commission decided to grant leave to amend the application and determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the TWU had genuinely tried to reach agreement with Cleanaway and whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of written notice for the industrial action. The Commission was satisfied that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The Commission also determined that there were relevant exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of written notice for the industrial action under section 443(5) of the Act. The date by which voting was to close was set at 26 June 2025, and an extended notice period of five working days applied to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order. The ballot would be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent under section 468A of the Act.

The Commission granted the TWU's application for a protected action ballot order, with the extended notice period of five working days. The date by which voting was to close was set at 26 June 2025. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act. The Commission issued an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. The parties were directed to attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. The final orders were issued in PR788134 and PR788135.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.