[2013] FWCA 4974 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s 185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Transit (NSW) Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1742)
TRANSIT (NSW) SERVICES PTY LTD AND THE TRANSPORT WORKERS' UNION OF AUSTRALIA FAIR WORK AGREEMENT 2013
Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 30 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Transit (NSW) Services Pty Ltd and the Transport Workers' Union of Australia Fair Work Agreement 2013.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Transit (NSW) Services Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise greenfields agreement to be known as the Transit (NSW) Services Pty Ltd and the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia Fair Work Agreement 2013 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with the Transport Workers’ Union (the ‘Union’). The Agreement is to cover employees of the applicant who are to be principally employed as Bus Drivers. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.
[2] Pursuant to s 182(3) of the Act, the Agreement was made between the applicant and the Union on 14 June 2013. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 22 June 2013, thereby satisfying s 185(4) of the Act.
[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F20) Mr Michael Kent, General Counsel, identified the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 [MA000063] as the relevant reference instrument for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Kentsaid that the Agreement does provide for some conditions that are less beneficial than those under the reference instrument, including a slightly lower meal allowance, a lack of provision for First Aid Allowance and the removal of triple time penalty rates for work performed on Easter Saturday. However, the Agreement provides for a number of terms and conditions that are more beneficial than or in excess of those under the reference instruments, including higher rates of pay, a higher Articulated Bus Allowance, more generous redundancy entitlements, 25% annual leave loading and an allowance for issuing tickets or collecting fares. Rates of pay are to be adjusted in accordance with the Commission’s Minimum Wage Review decisions. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 33 and 32 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure cl 31 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.
[4] At a hearing of the application on 11 July 2013, Mr D Ey, Solicitor,appeared with Mr M Kent of the applicant and Mr A Guy for the Union. The Union had filed a Declaration in relation to the application (Form 21) supporting the approval of the Agreement and giving notice that it wishes to be covered by…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Transit (NSW) Services Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4974
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the provisions of the FWA to ensure it complied with the legislative requirements. It assessed whether the agreement adequately protected employees' rights and interests, and if it promoted a cooperative relationship between the employer and the union. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement was consistent with the principles of the national workplace relations system, including those relating to enterprise bargaining and the avoidance of industrial action. After thorough deliberation, the Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and met all the necessary criteria for approval.
The Commission approved the FWA, recognising that it provided a fair and equitable framework for the employment relationship. The agreement was deemed to be in the best interests of the employees and the employer, promoting stability and productivity in the workplace. The Commission's decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the agreement's provisions and its alignment with the overarching objectives of the Fair Work Act. The approval of the FWA marked a significant step towards formalising the terms and conditions of employment for the parties involved, ensuring a balanced and just resolution to their negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.