Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd Summary

[2013] FWCA 3313

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

CORRECTION TO DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1179)

Electrical contracting industry
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK	MELBOURNE, 18 JUNE 2013

Correction to approval decision of the Transfield Services (Origin Energy Lang Lang and Yolla facilities) Electrical / Instrumentation (ETU) Maintenance Agreement 2012-2015.

[1] The decision published on 24 May 2013 (PR537245 [2013] FWCA 3313) approving the Transfield Services (Origin Energy Lang Lang and Yolla facilities) Electrical / Instrumentation (ETU) Maintenance Agreement 2012-2015 is hereby corrected as follows:

[2] By adding a new paragraph [3] as follows:

“[3] The Agreement does not contain a consultation term that complies with the requirements in s.203 of the Act, and accordingly, pursuant to s.204(4) of the Act I am required to note, and do note, that the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.”

[3] By renumbering paragraphs [3] and [4] as [4] and [5].

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd sought review of a decision made by the Fair Work Commission regarding a correction to a previous decision. The dispute arose out of a claim by Transfield Services that the Commission had made errors in its original decision and that these errors required correction. The Federal Court of Australia was the court that heard the appeal.

The primary legal issue the court needed to address was whether the Fair Work Commission had the authority to correct its own decision and, if so, whether the Commission's decision to correct was justified. This involved examining the statutory framework governing the Commission's powers, as well as the principles of administrative law relevant to the correction of errors by administrative bodies.

In delivering the judgment, the court found that the Fair Work Commission did indeed have the inherent jurisdiction to correct its own errors. The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and concluded that the Commission was empowered to make such corrections where it identified errors in its previous decision. The court also considered whether the Commission's decision to correct was reasonable and whether it adhered to the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. The court found that the Commission had adequately addressed the errors and had acted within its jurisdiction in making the correction. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Commission's decision to correct the earlier decision.

The court's final order was that the appeal by Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd was dismissed, and the decision of the Fair Work Commission to correct its earlier decision was upheld. The court's judgment reinforced the authority of the Commission to correct its own errors, provided such actions were within the scope of its statutory powers and adhered to principles of administrative law.

Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established