Tran v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

TRAN

v

THE QUEEN

[2020] HCASL 17
S268/2019

  1. This application for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales requires an extension of time in order to proceed. The decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal is not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

S.J. Gageler P.A. Keane
12 February 2020
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Tran v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] HCASL 17
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this matter, the applicant, Tran, seeks special leave to appeal a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute arises out of Tran's conviction and sentence for drug-related offences. The High Court was asked to consider whether special leave to appeal should be granted, and if so, whether an extension of time to lodge the application should be permitted.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision was attended by sufficient doubt to warrant the grant of special leave. Additionally, the Court had to consider whether the extension of time sought by the applicant was justified. The Court noted that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal was not in doubt, and accordingly, there was no basis to grant special leave. The Court also determined that, because there was no basis to grant special leave, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.

The Court found that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal was not in doubt and, therefore, there was no basis to grant special leave. The Court also found that, because there was no basis to grant special leave, it would be futile to grant an extension of time. The Court accordingly dismissed the application for special leave and the application for an extension of time. The Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.