Traffic Act Amendment Act (No. 3) 1972 (WA)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA.

TRAFFIC (No. 3).

No. 92 of 1972.

AN ACT to amend section thirty-two B of the Traffic

Act, 1919-1972.

[ Assented to 4th December, 1972.]

BE it enacted by the Queen's Most ExcellentMajesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Western Australia, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—

Short title

1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Traffic Act

and citation.

Amendment Act (No. 3), 1972.

Reprinted as

(2)

In this Act the Traffic Act, 1919-1972, is

approved for reprint 30th

referred to as the principal Act.

July, 1971

and amended

(3) The principal Act as amended by this Act may

by Acts Nos.33 and 34 of

be cited as the Traffic Act, 1919-1972.

of 1972.

1971 and 20

Commence-

2. This Act shall come into operation on a date

ment.

to be fixed by proclamation.

No. 92.]

Traffic (No. 3).

[1972.

Section 32B

amended.

3. Section 32B of the principal Act is amended

(a)

by repealing and re-enacting subsection (2) as follows

(2) Where a member of the Police Force or an inspector has reasonable grounds for believing that a person has commit- ted an offence against section thirty-two of this Act, by reason of his being under the influence of alcohol, the member of the Police Force or inspector may require the person to submit himself for analysis of his breath for alcohol or submit him- self to a medical practitioner and allow a sample of his blood to be taken, as the provisions of subsections (3), (4) and (5) of this section may, in the circumstances, require. ;

(b)

by adding after the word "nature" in line two of paragraph (c) of subsection (3), the passage ", or is so affected by alcohol," ;

(c)

by repealing and re-enacting subsection (4) as follows

(4) Where

(a)

a member of the Police Force or an inspector might, by virtue of subsection (1) or (2) of this section, require a person to sub- mit himself for analysis of his breath but is precluded from so doing by subsection (3) of this section; or

(b)

a member of the Police Force or an inspector might, by virtue of subsection (1) of this section, require a person to undergo a preliminary test but the person has sustained a bodily injury of such a nature as to render him incapable of undergoing, satis- factorily, the preliminary test,

1972.]

Traffic (No. 3).

[No. 92.

then, but in no other circumstances, the member of the Police Force or inspector may require the person to submit him- self to a medical practitioner nominated by that person and allow a sample of his blood to be taken or, where the person is incapable of submitting himself, cause a sample of his blood to be taken by a medical practitioner, if, in either event (but excluding the case of a deceased person), the sample can be taken within four hours after the occurrence of the event giving rise to the requirement. ; and

(d) by adding after subsection (11) a subsection

as follows

(12) Where a person is apparently unconscious or seriously injured a mem- ber of the Police Force or an inspector shall facilitate the provision of medical assistance for that person. .

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0