Trade Practices Act 1971 (Cth)
An
Act to amend the
[
BE it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
(2.) The
(3.) The Principal Act, as amended by this Act,
may be cited as the
(2.) Sections 1, 2 and 15 of this Act shall come into operation on the date on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
(3.) Each Part and section inserted in the Principal Act by this Act shall come into operation on the date fixed under sub-section (1.) of this section.
(4.) At any time after this Act has received the Royal Assent and before the date fixed under sub-section (1.) of this section, regulations may be made under the Principal Act as amended by this Act as if the whole of this Act had come into operation on the date on which this Act received the Royal Assent but regulations so made do not come into operation before the first-mentioned date.
(
“Division 3.—Review of Determinations, and Judicial Determination of Questions of Law (Sections 62–66).”
the words—
“Part VIa.—Resale Price Maintenance.
Division 1.—The Unlawful Practice of Resale Price Maintenance (Sections 66a-66g).
Division 2.—Exemptions (Sections 66h-66l).
Division 3.—General (Sections 66m-66n).”; and
(
b ) by omitting the words—“Civil Remedies (Sections 88–90).”
and inserting in their stead the words—
“Civil Remedies (Sections 88–90ab).”.
“‘the practice of resale price maintenance’ means the practice of resale price maintenance referred to in Part VIa.;”.
“(
ba )the practice of resale price maintenance is a practice in relation to which this section applies only if it is engaged in, or is proposed to be engaged in, wholly or partly in Tasmania;”.
(
a )by omitting from sub-section (2.) the words “the Governor-General determines” and inserting in their stead the words “are prescribed”; and(
b )by omitting from sub-section (3.) the words “the Attorney-General determines” and inserting in their stead the words” are prescribed”.
(
a )by omitting from sub-section (2.) the words “the Governor-General determines” and inserting in their stead the words “are prescribed”; and(
b )by omitting from sub-section (3.) the words “the Attorney-General determines” and inserting in their stead the words “are prescribed”.
(
a ) by inserting after sub-section (1.) the following sub-section:—“(1a.) In the application of this section in relation to Part VIa., the Tribunal—
(
a )may, by order, give such directions as it thinks fit as to giving notice of the application; and(
b )may make an order rescinding a determination without substituting another determination for it.”; and(
b ) by adding at the end of sub-section (6.) the words “or under Part VIa.”.
“Part VIa.—Resale Price Maintenance.
“66a. This Part applies to and in relation to the practice of resale price maintenance where that practice is engaged in or is proposed to be engaged in—
(
a ) in the course of trade or commerce with other countries or among the States;(
b )so as to tend to prevent or hinder transactions, acts or operations in the course of trade or commerce referred to in the last preceding paragraph;(
c ) by—(i) a trading corporation formed within the limits of the Commonwealth;
(ii) a financial corporation so formed; or
(iii) a foreign corporation;
(
d )in respect of the supply of goods to the Commonwealth or to an authority or instrumentality of the Commonwealth; or(
e ) in the course of trade or commerce—(i) within a Territory;
(ii) between a State and a Territory;
(iii) between two Territories; or
(iv) between a Territory and a place outside Australia,
and, except as provided by section 7a of this Act, not otherwise.
“66b.—(1.) It is unlawful to engage in the practice of resale price maintenance.
“(2.) Subject to this Part, a person (in this section called ‘the supplier’) engages in the practice of resale price maintenance if—
(
a )the supplier makes it known to a second person that he will not supply goods to the second person unless the second person agrees to sell those goods at a price not less than a price specified by the supplier;(
b )the supplier induces, or attempts to induce, a second person not to sell, at a price less than a price specified by the supplier, goods supplied to the second person by the supplier;(
c ) the supplier enters into an agreement, or offers to enter into an agreement, for the supply of goods to a second person, being an agreement one of the terms of which is, or would be, that the second person will not sell the goods at a price less than a price specified, or that would be specified, by the supplier;(
d )the supplier withholds the supply of goods to a second person for the reason that the second person—(i) has not agreed as mentioned in paragraph (
a ) of this sub-section; or(ii) has sold, or is likely to sell, goods supplied to him by the supplier, or goods supplied to him by a third person who, directly or indirectly, has obtained the goods from the supplier, at a price less than the price specified by the supplier as the price below which the goods are not to be sold;
(
e ) the supplier withholds the supply of goods to a second person for the reason that a third person who, directly or indirectly, has obtained, or wishes to obtain, goods from the second person—(i) has not agreed to sell those goods at a price not less than a price specified by the supplier; or
(ii) has sold, or is likely to sell, goods supplied to him, or to be supplied to him, by the second person, at a price less than the price specified by the supplier as the price below which the goods are not to be sold; or
(
f )the supplier uses, in relation to any goods supplied, or that may be supplied, by him to a second person, a statement of a price that is likely to be understood by that person as the price below which the goods are not to be sold.
“(3.) For the purposes of the last preceding sub-section, where—
(
a )a price is specified by another person on behalf of the supplier, it shall be deemed to have been specified by the supplier;(
b )the supplier makes it known, in respect of goods, that the price below which those goods are not to be sold is a price specified by another person in respect of those goods, or inrespect of goods of a like description, that price shall be deemed to have been specified, in respect of the first-mentioned goods, by the supplier;
(
c ) a formula is specified by or on behalf of the supplier and a price may be ascertained by calculation from, or by reference to, that formula, that price shall be deemed to have been specified by the supplier; and(
d )the supplier makes it known, in respect of goods, that the price below which those goods are not to be sold is a price ascertained by calculation from, or by reference to, a formula specified by another person in respect of those goods, or in respect of goods of a like description, that price shall be deemed to have been specified, in respect of the first-mentioned goods, by the supplier.
“(4.) In the last preceding sub-section, ‘formula’ includes a set form or method.
“(5.) For the purposes of sub-section (2.) of this section, anything done by a person acting on behalf of, or by arrangement with, the supplier shall be deemed to have been done by the supplier.
“(6.) This section does not apply in respect of a practice that is specifically authorized or approved by an Act, a State Act or an Ordinance of a Territory or by regulations under such an Act or Ordinance.
“66c. For
the purposes of paragraph (
‘The price set out or referred to herein is a recommended price only and there is no obligation to comply with the recommendation.’
“66d.—(1.) For
the purposes of paragraph (
(
a )he refuses or fails to supply those goods to, or as requested by, the other person;(
b )he refuses to supply those goods except on terms that are disadvantageous to the other person;(
c ) in supplying goods to the other person, he treats that person less favourably (whether in respect of time, method or place of delivery or otherwise) than he treats other persons to whom he supplies the same or similar goods; or(
d )he causes or procures a person to withhold the supply of goods to another person as mentioned in any of the last three preceding paragraphs.
“(2.) Paragraph (
(
a )for the purpose of attracting to the establishment at which the goods were sold persons likely to purchase other goods; or(
b ) otherwise for the purpose of promoting the business of that other person.
“(3.) For the purposes of the last preceding sub-section, there shall be disregarded—
(
a ) a sale of goods that took place before the commencement of this section;(
b )a genuine seasonal or clearance sale of goods that were not acquired for the purpose of being sold at that sale; or(
c ) a sale of goods that took place with the consent of the supplier of the goods.
“66e.—(1.) For
the purposes of paragraph (
(
a )a statement is applied to goods, whether by being woven in, impressed on, worked into or annexed or affixed to the goods or otherwise;(
b )a statement is applied to a covering, label, reel or thing in or with which goods are supplied; or(
c )a statement is used in a sign, advertisement, invoice, catalogue, business letter, business paper, price list or other document or otherwise in a manner likely to lead to the belief that it refers to goods,
the statement shall be deemed to have been used in relation to those goods.
“(2.) For the purposes of the last preceding sub-section, ‘covering’ includes a stopper, glass, bottle, vessel, box, capsule, case, frame or wrapper and ‘label’ includes a band or ticket.
“(3.) Paragraph (
“66f. Criminal proceedings do not lie against a person by reason only that he—
(
a ) has engaged in, or has attempted to engage in, the practice of resale price maintenance;(
b )has aided, abetted, counselled or procured a person to engage in that practice;(
c ) was in any way directly or indirectly knowingly concerned in, or party to, the engagement by a person in that practice; or(
d ) conspired with others to engage in that practice.
“66g. Where the practice of resale price maintenance is provided for by an agreement, the agreement is unenforceable as regards engaging in the practice.
“66h.—(1.) A person may apply to the Tribunal for a determination exempting from the application of this Part the goods described in the application, being goods that he supplies or is intending to supply otherwise than by way of sale by retail.
“(2.) Such an application shall be as prescribed and shall be lodged with the Registrar.
“(3.) The prescribed fee shall be paid to the Registrar upon the lodging of the application and if the fee is not paid the application shall be deemed not to have been lodged.
“(4.) The applicant shall serve a copy of the application on the Commissioner and he shall be taken to be a party to the proceedings.
“(5.) As soon as practicable after an application has
been lodged with the Registrar, the Registrar shall cause notice of the
application to be published in the
“(6.) The notice shall include the name of the applicant and a description of the goods to which it relates.
“(7.) The applicant may, by leave of the Tribunal, amend the application and, where leave is so granted, shall serve a copy of the application as amended on the Commissioner.
“(8.) Where an application is amended, the Registrar shall cause notice of the amended application to be advertised as provided by subsections (5.) and (6.) of this section.
“66j. The Tribunal may, on application by the Commissioner, direct an applicant to amend his application—
(
a ) so as to describe more appropriately the goods in respect of which the application is made; or(
b )so as to exclude certain goods from the application for the reason that the Tribunal cannot otherwise deal satisfactorily with the application.
“66k.—(1.) The Tribunal shall, after making such inquiry as it thinks fit—
(
a )make a determination exempting all or any of the goods the subject of the application from the application of this Part; or(
b ) make a determination dismissing the application.
“(2.) The Tribunal shall not make a determination exempting goods from the application of this Part unless the Tribunal is satisfied that, unless the exemption is granted—
(
a )the quality of the goods available for sale, or the varieties of the goods so available, would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as consumers or users of those goods;(
b )the number of establishments in which the goods are sold by retail would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as consumers or users of those goods;(
c ) the prices at which the goods are sold by retail would ultimately be increased to the detriment of the public as consumers or users of those goods;(
d )the goods would be sold by retail under conditions likely to cause danger to the health of human beings or animals in consequence of their misuse; or(
e ) any necessary services provided in connexion with or after the sale of the goods by retail would cease to be so provided or would be substantially reduced to the detriment of the public as consumers or users of those goods.
“(3.) For the purposes of the last preceding sub-section, detriment to the public as consumers or users of goods shall not be taken into account unless it would outweigh any detriment to them as consumers or users of the goods (whether by the restriction of competition or otherwise) that would result if the determination were made.
“(4.) The Tribunal may, if it thinks fit, make one determination in respect of two or more applications.
“(5.) In this section—
‘consumer’ includes a person consuming for the purpose of, or in the course of, trade or business or for a public purpose and ‘user’ has a corresponding meaning;
‘necessary services’, in relation to goods, means services that, having regard to the character of the goods, are reasonably necessary to guard against the risk of injury in connexion with the consumption, installation or use of the goods or are otherwise reasonably necessary for the benefit of consumers or users.
“66l. A determination under this Division has effect in respect of all the goods to which the determination relates and not merely in respect of goods of the applicant.
“66m.—(1.) Where, in proceedings under this Act by a person (in this section referred to as ‘the plaintiff’) against another person (in this section referred to as ‘the defendant’), it is claimed that the defendant has engaged in the practice of resale price maintenance and it is proved that—
(
a )the defendant has acted, in relation to the plaintiff, as mentioned in paragraph (a ), (b ), (c ) or (d ) of sub-section (1.) of section 66d of this Act;(
b )during a period ending immediately before the time when the defendant so acted, the defendant had been supplying goods of the kind withheld to the plaintiff or to another person carrying on a business similar to that of the plaintiff; and(
c ) during the period of six months ending immediately before the time when the defendant so acted, the plaintiff, or a person who had obtained goods, directly or indirectly, from the plaintiff, to the knowledge of the defendant—(i) did not, when requested to do so, enter into an agreement as mentioned in paragraph (
a ) of sub-section (2.) of section 66b of this Act;(ii) sold, at a price less than a price specified by the defendant (or that, by virtue of sub-section (3.) of section 66b of this Act, is to be deemed to have been so specified), goods supplied by the defendant or by a person who, directly or indirectly, had obtained those goods from the defendant; or
(iii) had indicated to the defendant his intention so to sell goods supplied as mentioned in the last preceding sub-paragraph,
then,
subject to the next succeeding sub-section, it shall be presumed, unless the
contrary is proved, that the defendant withheld the supply of the goods for the
reason that the plaintiff, or a person who had obtained goods, directly or
indirectly, from the plaintiff, had acted as mentioned in sub-paragraph (i) or
(ii), as the case may be, of paragraph (
“(2.) The last preceding sub-section does not apply
where the plaintiff proves the matter mentioned in paragraph (
“(3.) In the application of this section in
proceedings by the Attorney-General or the Commissioner for an injunction,
references to the plaintiff shall be read as references to a person specified
in the application for the injunction as the person in relation to whom the
defendant is claimed to have acted as mentioned in paragraph (
“66n. Section 58 of this Act and Division 3 of Part VI. apply in relation to this Part as they apply in relation to that Part.”.
“(1.) A person who suffers loss or damage by an act of another person that—
(
a )was done in contravention of an order of the Tribunal in proceedings under Part VI.;(
b ) constitutes the practice of resale price maintenance; or(
c ) was done in contravention of section 85 or 86 of this Act,
may recover the amount of the loss or damage by action against that other person.”.
“90aa.—(1.) Where a person has engaged in the practice of resale price maintenance, the Court may, on application by—
(
a ) the Attorney-General;(
b ) the Commissioner; or(
c ) a person who has suffered loss or damage by reason of the first-mentioned person having engaged in that practice,
grant an injunction restraining the first-mentioned person from engaging in the practice of resale price maintenance in respect of such goods as are specified in the order.
“(2.) The Court may rescind or vary an order made under the last preceding sub-section.
“(3.) Proceedings for contempt of court in respect of an injunction granted under this section may be brought by a person referred to in any of the paragraphs of sub-section (1.) of this section.
“90ab. Jurisdiction is conferred on the Court to hear and determine actions and other proceedings under this Part and that jurisdiction is exclusive of the jurisdiction of any other court, other than the jurisdiction of the High Court under section 75 of the Constitution.”.
0
0
0