TRACEY
v
THE KING
[2024] HCASL 329
B44/2024
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (Mullins P, Morrison JA and Callaghan J) made on 20 February 2024 dismissing an appeal against conviction for murder.
The proposed appeal does not have sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave, nor does it raise any point of general principle. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time.
Special leave to appeal is refused.
Gageler CJ
Gordon J
Edelman J
Steward J
Gleeson J
Jagot J
Beech-Jones J5 December 2024
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Tracey v The King and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] HCASL 329
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the applicant's appeal and assessed its merits. The court found that the proposed appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave, and it did not raise any point of general principle. Given these findings, the court concluded that granting the extension of time would be futile. The court was therefore of the opinion that special leave to appeal should be refused.
In its judgment, the court emphasised that the appeal did not present any new or significant legal issues that would warrant further consideration. The court was not persuaded that the appeal had any reasonable prospect of success, nor did it identify any broader legal principles that needed to be addressed. As a result, the court declined to grant the extension of time and dismissed the application for special leave to appeal.
The final orders of the court were to refuse the applicant's request for an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal, thereby upholding the dismissal of the appeal against the murder conviction by the Queensland Court of Appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.