Tracey Priestley v Metcash Trading

Case

[2014] FWC 5554

14 AUGUST 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWC 5554
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Tracey Priestley
v
Metcash Trading
(U2014/7117)

COMMISSIONER WILSON

MELBOURNE, 14 AUGUST 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal.

[1] On 7 May 2014, Ms Tracey Priestley made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] Ms Priestley did not pay the required fee.

[3] On 15 May 2014, Ms Priestley was advised by email correspondence that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with her application.

[4] Section 395, which deals with application fees, provides:

    395 Application fees

    (1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

    (2) The regulations may prescribe:

      (a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

      (b) a method for indexing the fee; and

      (c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

[5] On 16 June, 17 June and 3 July 2014, the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) attempted to contact Ms Priestley in relation to the correspondence dated 15 May 2014.

[6] On 16 July 2014, another voicemail message was left on both the mobile and home telephone. On the same day, email correspondence was also forwarded to Ms Priestley.

[7] On 29 July, 6 August and 12 August 2014, the Commission attempted to contact Ms Priestley in relation to correspondence dated 15 May 2014 and 16 July 2014.

[8] No response has been received from Ms Priestley and payment of the required fee has not been made.

[9] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

    587 Dismissing applications

    (1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

      (a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

      (b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

      (c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[10] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Act, the application was not made in accordance with the Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR554283>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0