DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2000] AATA 195
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL)
Nº V98/168
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION)
CHRISTOPHER REES TOWIE
ApplicantOFFICIAL RECEIVER
First respondent
INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY
Second respondent
DECISION
Tribunal: Deputy President G.L. McDonald
Date:10 March 2000
Place:Melbourne
Decision: The decision under review is set aside, and the matter is remitted to the first respondent with a direction that there is no objection to the applicant's discharge from bankruptcy.
(sgd) G.L. McDonald
Deputy President
BANKRUPTCY — application to review various decisions made under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 — application to review decision of trustee to issue contribution assessment and decision of Inspector-General to refuse to reconsider contribution assessment lodged out of time — application to review decision to issue notice under s.139ZL of the Bankruptcy Act beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction — review of decision of Official Receiver to object to discharge — statutory grounds of objection — circumstances of bankrupt — failure to pay assessed contribution — exercise of discretion
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 ss.29(2)(a), 37
Bankruptcy Act 1966 ss.139J, 139L 139W, 139X, 139Z, 139ZA, 139ZD, 139ZE(1)(b),
139ZF, 139ZG, 139ZL, 149A(2)(a)(i), 149B, 149D(1), 149Q(a)
Re Hall (1994) 14 ACSR 488
REASONS FOR DECISION
10 March 2000 Deputy President G.L. McDonald
The applicant is applying for the review of various decisions made under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ("the Bankruptcy Act"), resulting in an objection pursuant to s.149B of the Bankruptcy Act, dated 9 January 1998, to his discharge from bankruptcy. The Tribunal is empowered to review that latter decision by s.149Q(a) of the Bankruptcy Act.
At the hearing Dr Towie, who is a general medical practitioner, represented himself. The Official Receiver was initially represented by Ms A. Mendes Da Costa and subsequently by Ms F. McLeod, both of counsel. To the limited extent that the hearing involved him, the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy was represented by Mr G. Carroll of the Australian Government Solicitor. Dr Towie, Ms M. Lorenzetto, who had been the practice manager in the Coburg Five Star Medical Clinic; Mr H. Birdogan, who, at the relevant time, was a director of the trustee company Gunesh Pty Ltd ("Gunesh"), which, until its liquidation in 1996, was manager of the Meadow Heights and Mordialloc Five Star Medical Clinics; and Mr W. Ballantyne, who is an employee of the Official Receiver, all gave oral evidence for the applicant. Mr D. Eng, who is an assistant official receiver, a qualified CPA accountant, gave oral evidence for the first respondent. The Tribunal had before it the documents filed for the purposes of s.37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ("the AAT Act") (the "T" documents) and other extensive documentation tendered during the course of the hearing.
In his application to this Tribunal of 18 February 1998, Dr Towie has nominated the following four decisions for review:
(a)assessment of income of 1995-1996 made by the Official Receiver [dated 14 March 1997 (T4)];
(b)refusal to reconsider [i.e. refusal by the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy pursuant to s.139ZE(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act (T6)];
Continue reading Towie and Anor and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Towie and Anor and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2000] AATA 195
- Case
- [2000] AATA 195
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in this case included the scope of review for certain decisions made under the Bankruptcy Act, specifically whether the Federal Circuit Court or the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to review certain notices issued under the Act. The court was also required to determine whether Dr Towie's failure to pay the assessed contribution was a valid ground for objecting to his discharge from bankruptcy.
The court found that the notice issued under s.139ZL of the Bankruptcy Act was not subject to review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, as the Act does not provide for such review. However, the court did have the power to set aside such a notice. The court also found that Dr Towie's application for review of the objection to his discharge from bankruptcy was valid and that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review this decision. Regarding the objection to Dr Towie's discharge from bankruptcy, the court found that the failure to pay the assessed contribution was a valid ground for objection, as it was one of the alternative grounds specified in the Bankruptcy Act.
The final orders of the court were that the decision of the Official Receiver to issue a notice under s.139ZL of the Bankruptcy Act was not subject to review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, but could be set aside by the Federal Circuit Court. The court also found that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review Dr Towie's application for review of the objection to his discharge from bankruptcy, and that the failure to pay the assessed contribution was a valid ground for objection.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.