Towie and Anor and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy

Case [2000] AATA 195


DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2000] AATA 195

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL)

Nº V98/168

GENERAL  ADMINISTRATIVE  DIVISION)                 

CHRISTOPHER REES TOWIE    
  Applicant

OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  First respondent

INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY     
  Second respondent

DECISION

Tribunal:       Deputy President G.L. McDonald

Date:10 March 2000

Place:Melbourne

Decision:      The decision under review is set aside, and the matter is remitted to the first respondent with a direction that there is no objection to the applicant's discharge from bankruptcy.           

(sgd) G.L. McDonald
  Deputy President
BANKRUPTCY — application to review various decisions made under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 — application to review decision of trustee to issue contribution assessment and decision of Inspector-General to refuse to reconsider contribution assessment lodged out of time — application to review decision to issue notice under s.139ZL of the Bankruptcy Act beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction — review of decision of Official Receiver to object to discharge — statutory grounds of objection — circumstances of bankrupt — failure to pay assessed contribution — exercise of discretion
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 ss.29(2)(a), 37
Bankruptcy Act 1966 ss.139J, 139L 139W, 139X, 139Z, 139ZA, 139ZD, 139ZE(1)(b),

139ZF, 139ZG, 139ZL, 149A(2)(a)(i), 149B, 149D(1), 149Q(a)

Re Hall (1994) 14 ACSR 488

REASONS FOR DECISION

10 March 2000  Deputy President G.L. McDonald

  1. The applicant is applying for the review of various decisions made under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ("the Bankruptcy Act"), resulting in an objection pursuant to s.149B of the Bankruptcy Act, dated 9 January 1998, to his discharge from bankruptcy. The Tribunal is empowered to review that latter decision by s.149Q(a) of the Bankruptcy Act.

  2. At the hearing Dr Towie, who is a general medical practitioner, represented himself. The Official Receiver was initially represented by Ms A. Mendes Da Costa and subsequently by Ms F. McLeod, both of counsel. To the limited extent that the hearing involved him, the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy was represented by Mr G. Carroll of the Australian Government Solicitor. Dr Towie, Ms M. Lorenzetto, who had been the practice manager in the Coburg Five Star Medical Clinic; Mr H. Birdogan, who, at the relevant time, was a director of the trustee company Gunesh Pty Ltd ("Gunesh"), which, until its liquidation in 1996, was manager of the Meadow Heights and Mordialloc Five Star Medical Clinics; and Mr W. Ballantyne, who is an employee of the Official Receiver, all gave oral evidence for the applicant. Mr D. Eng, who is an assistant official receiver, a qualified CPA accountant, gave oral evidence for the first respondent. The Tribunal had before it the documents filed for the purposes of s.37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ("the AAT Act") (the "T" documents) and other extensive documentation tendered during the course of the hearing.

  3. In his application to this Tribunal of 18 February 1998, Dr Towie has nominated the following four decisions for review:

    (a)assessment of income of 1995-1996 made by the Official Receiver [dated 14 March 1997 (T4)];

    (b)refusal to reconsider [i.e. refusal by the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy pursuant to s.139ZE(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act (T6)];

Continue reading Towie and Anor and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Towie and Anor and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2000] AATA 195
Case
[2000] AATA 195
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Towie and Anor and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy involves Dr Towie, a medical practitioner, and the Official Receiver, who is pursuing payment of a contribution assessment from Dr Towie. The dispute centres on whether Dr Towie's failure to pay the assessed contribution means he should not be discharged from bankruptcy. The matter was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.

The legal issues in this case included the scope of review for certain decisions made under the Bankruptcy Act, specifically whether the Federal Circuit Court or the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to review certain notices issued under the Act. The court was also required to determine whether Dr Towie's failure to pay the assessed contribution was a valid ground for objecting to his discharge from bankruptcy.

The court found that the notice issued under s.139ZL of the Bankruptcy Act was not subject to review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, as the Act does not provide for such review. However, the court did have the power to set aside such a notice. The court also found that Dr Towie's application for review of the objection to his discharge from bankruptcy was valid and that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review this decision. Regarding the objection to Dr Towie's discharge from bankruptcy, the court found that the failure to pay the assessed contribution was a valid ground for objection, as it was one of the alternative grounds specified in the Bankruptcy Act.

The final orders of the court were that the decision of the Official Receiver to issue a notice under s.139ZL of the Bankruptcy Act was not subject to review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, but could be set aside by the Federal Circuit Court. The court also found that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review Dr Towie's application for review of the objection to his discharge from bankruptcy, and that the failure to pay the assessed contribution was a valid ground for objection.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

As to decision (c), s.139ZL of the Act, gives power to the Official Receiver by notice to direct a payment to the Official Receiver of an amount otherwise payable to the bankrupt. While there is power for the Federal Court to set aside such a notice, there is no power given in the Act for the Tribunal to review the issuance of such a notice. Accordingly, this matter is also outside the power of the Tribunal to review. Decision (d) The fourth and final decision (d) of Dr Towie's application for review is indisputably reviewable by the Tribunal. A decision under s.149D of the Bankruptcy Act sets out a number of alternative grounds upon which an objection to a person's release from bankruptcy can be lodged, including—149D (1) . . .(f)the bankrupt failed to pay to the trustee an amount that the bankrupt was liable to pay under s.139ZG;. . . Dr Towie is, and has been, since graduating in 1982, and then completing the necessary internship, a general medical practitioner. On 14 March 1997 a notice of contribution assessment was issued in the amount of $36,121, payable at the rate of $3010 per month to commence on 4 April 1997 (T4). No contribution was paid and on 16 June 1997 a notice under s.139ZL of the Bankruptcy Act, requiring payment of the assessed contribution to be made by the Health Insurance Commission ("HIC") at the rate of $4000 per month was issued. The s.139ZL notice effectively redirected payments to the Official Trustee which would otherwise have been made under Dr Towie's provider health care number through HIC reimbursement. The notice was subsequently withdrawn and sums received by the trustee from the HIC were reimbursed when it was found that the funds did not constitute income of Dr Towie, but income of the practice for which Dr Towie was then working. No sum has been received by the Official Trustee by way of contribution from Dr Towie. The Official Receiver complains that Dr Towie has not co-operated in relation to the payment of the contributions and states that objecting to his discharge from bankruptcy is the only means available [to secure payment of the contributions] (T1, p.14). Dr Towie claims that he has co-operated with the Official Receiver, but that his failure to make any contribution arises because he has not been in receipt of sufficient income to require the payment of a contribution. Dr Towie claims that a number of circumstances have made it impossible for him to make a payment of the contribution, including-(a)the manner in which a number of the medical practices in which he had a financial interest, through various companies and trusts, have been liquidated or dissolved has resulted in severe personal trauma and disastrous financial consequences for him;(b)the issuance of the s.139ZL notice in June 1997 effectively made it impossible for him to obtain employment as a medical practitioner because payment of any money he earned on behalf of any medical practice employing him would be automatically redirected to the OfficialTrustee thereby bypassing the employer; and(c)while he had secured temporary employment for a time as a labourer, his living conditions and personal circumstances were such that he could not earn enough to support himself let alone make any payment.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.