Toupin (Migration)

Case

[2018] AATA 2497

5 June 2018


Toupin (Migration) [2018] AATA 2497 (5 June 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Miss Nicole Kathleen Toupin

CASE NUMBER:  1811502

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):           BCC2018/541520

MEMBER:M. Edgoose

DATE:5 June 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne, Victoria

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

·cl.500.211(a) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 05 June 2018 at 8:27am

CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – Genuine student – Enrolment in a course of study

LEGISLATION
Education Services for Overseas Act 2000 (Cth), Division 3 Part 2
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), cls 500.111, 500.211

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 10 April 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 31 January 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

  3. The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the delegate was not satisfied the applicant was enrolled.

  4. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  5. The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is that the applicant does not meet the requirements of cl.500.211.

  6. Clause 500.211 relevantly requires that at the time of this decision the applicant is enrolled in a course of study: cl.500.211(a). The applicant does not claim to meet any of the alternative criteria in cl.500.211.

  7. ‘Course of study’ is relevantly defined in cl.500.111 of the Regulations as a ‘full-time registered course’. ‘Registered course’ is defined in r.1.03 of the Regulations as a course of education or training provided by an institution, body or person that is registered, under Division 3 of Part 2 of the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000, to provide the course to overseas students.

  8. The applicant submitted to the Tribunal a Confirmation of Enrolment for a Certificate III in Early Childhood Education and Care (AAT Folio 51) that started on 9 April 2018 and is due to finish on 30 September 2018 through Holmesglen Institute.

  9. Therefore, the Tribunal is satisfied that at the time of this decision, the applicant is enrolled in a course of study and accordingly cl.500.211 is met.

  10. Given the above findings, the appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa.

    DECISION

  11. The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

    ·cl.500.211(a) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    M. Edgoose
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0