| [2015] FWCA 457 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Total Fire Solutions (Aust) Pty Limited
(AG2014/10291)
TOTAL FIRE SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 16 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Total Fire Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Total Fire Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Fair Work Commission notes and accepts the undertaking provided by the employer and it is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 23 January 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 23 January 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE412295 PR560196>
- AGLC
- Total Fire Solutions (Aust) Pty Limited [2015] FWCA 457
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 457
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues the Commission needed to address included the fairness of the classification of employees under the agreement, the adequacy of the wage rates, and the appropriateness of the dispute resolution provisions. The Commission also had to determine if the agreement met the requirements for being a single, integrated, and comprehensive enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act. Additionally, it was necessary to consider submissions from both the employer and the union representing the employees to ascertain if the agreement was genuinely bargained and fair.
In its reasoning, the Commission examined the evidence and submissions provided by both parties. It found that the classification of employees was reasonable and consistent with the nature of the work performed. The wage rates were deemed adequate, reflecting the skills and responsibilities of the employees. The dispute resolution mechanisms were considered appropriate for the context of the enterprise. The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, meeting the statutory requirements and reflecting genuine bargaining. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was granted.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.