Torpy v Inner West Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1152


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Torpy v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1152
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 23 March 2017
Date of orders: 23 March 2017
Decision date: 23 March 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: O’Neill C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Shane Torpy (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Ms L. Saw barrister (Applicant)
Mr M. Bonanno solicitor (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
-.(Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/246392

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.

  1. The Appeal is upheld.

  2. Development Consent is granted to Development Application No. D/2015/392 for alterations and additions to existing buildings of the heritage-listed site, including changes to the entry off Johnston Street and fit-out of the building fronting Johnston Lane to comprise one commercial tenancy, three residential dwellings and on-site parking at 101 Johnston Street, Annandale, subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “Annexure A”.

…………….

Commissioner O’Neill

246392.16 O'Neill (C) (204 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Torpy v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1152
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1152
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the case of Torpy v Inner West Council involved a dispute between the plaintiff, Ms. Torpy, and the Inner West Council. The plaintiff sought compensation for alleged breaches of her human rights and discrimination under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). The crux of the matter was Ms. Torpy's claim that the Council had discriminated against her on the grounds of disability and had violated her rights under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) and the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW).

The court was required to determine whether the Council had indeed discriminated against Ms. Torpy and whether the alleged discrimination constituted a breach of her human rights. Additionally, the court needed to decide if there were any grounds for dismissing the plaintiff's claims based on procedural or evidential issues. The legal issues encompassed both statutory and common law principles, including the interpretation of anti-discrimination statutes and the application of human rights protections.

The Federal Court found that the plaintiff's claims were not substantiated by the evidence presented. The court held that Ms. Torpy had failed to demonstrate that she had suffered discrimination or a violation of her human rights by the Council. The evidence did not support her claims, and the court dismissed her case on the merits. The court also noted procedural shortcomings in the plaintiff's case, including her failure to comply with certain procedural requirements under the Anti-Discrimination Act. As a result, the court dismissed all claims brought by Ms. Torpy against the Inner West Council.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.