Tony Sgroi v The Legislature Parliament of Nsw

Case [2022] FWC 2070


[2022] FWC 2070

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Tony Sgroi
v

The Legislature Parliament Of Nsw

(U2022/7100)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 5 AUGUST 2022

Application for relief from unfair dismissal- national system employer – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.

  1. On 13 July 2022, Tony Sgroi made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. On 15 July 2022, the Commission attempted to contact Tony Sgroi via his nominated telephone number to discuss his application. He did not answer the call. A voicemail message was left requesting him to contact the Commission to confirm his employment details.

  1. Later that day, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Sgroi’s nominated email address advising that based on the information contained in the application the Legislature Parliament of NSW may not be a national system employer and to urgently seek further advice on this issue, as the Commission may not have jurisdiction to deal with his application. The correspondence also required Mr Sgroi to advise the Commission within 14 days whether he wished to proceed with his application and warned that the application may be dismissed if no response was received.

  1. On 15 July 2022, Mr Sgroi telephoned the Commission and was advised that he may not have been employed by a National System Employer and the Commission may not have jurisdiction to deal with his application. During this telephone call it was recommended Mr Sgroi obtain legal advice and contact the Commission within 14 days to either provide further information or discontinue his application.

  1. As the required information was not received, on 28 July 2022 the Commission attempted to contact Mr Sgroi on his nominated telephone number. He did not answer the call. A voicemail message was left requesting him to contact the Commission to provide further information or discontinue his application by close of business 29 July 2022.

  1. To date, Mr Sgroi has not contacted the Commission or provided any further information.

  1. Division 1 of Part 3-2 of the FW Act is concerned with the “unfair dismissal of national system employees, and the granting of remedies for unfair dismissal”. Further, s.380 of the FW Act provides that, under this Part, an “employee means a national system employee, and employer means a national system employer”. Mr Sgroi and The Legislature Parliament of NSW do not respectively fall within the scope of this definition.

  1. In considering the provisions of the FW Act, I am satisfied that the Commission has no jurisdiction to determine Mr Sgroi’s application for unfair dismissal as his employment was not with a national system employer.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. In this circumstance, I have determined that the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act.

  1. Consequently, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An order giving effect to this decision will be issued shortly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR744505>

Details
AGLC
Tony Sgroi v The Legislature Parliament of Nsw [2022] FWC 2070
Case
[2022] FWC 2070
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Tony Sgroi applied to the Fair Work Commission for relief from an unfair dismissal claim against The Legislature Parliament of NSW. The Commission attempted to contact Mr Sgroi to discuss his application, but he did not respond to the calls or emails. The Commission informed Mr Sgroi that it might not have jurisdiction to deal with his application because his employer may not be a national system employer. The Commission requested Mr Sgroi to provide further information or discontinue his application, but he did not respond. The Commission found that it had no jurisdiction to determine Mr Sgroi’s application for unfair dismissal as his employment was not with a national system employer. The Commission dismissed the application under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act because it had no reasonable prospect of success.

The legal issue in this case was whether the Fair Work Commission had jurisdiction to determine Mr Sgroi’s application for unfair dismissal. The Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) provides that the Commission can only determine applications for unfair dismissal if the employee was employed by a national system employer. The Commission considered whether Mr Sgroi was employed by a national system employer and found that he was not. Therefore, the Commission did not have jurisdiction to determine the application. The Commission also considered whether the application was frivolous or vexatious or had no reasonable prospect of success. The Commission found that the application had no reasonable prospect of success because the employer was not a national system employer.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.