Legal Research
Cases
Tomamichel v McCann (No 2)

Tomamichel v McCann (No 2)

Case [2014] VCC 388

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Tomamichel v McCann (No 2) [2014] VCC 388
Case: [2014] VCC 388
Decision Date: 7 April 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Tomamichel v McCann (No 2) [2014] VCC 388

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd [2012] VSCA 232
Citation 1

…Lollis v Loulatzis & Anor (No 3) [2008] VSC 231; Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22; Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd [2012] VSCA 232 Judgment: Application to re-open the first plaintiff’s case granted, and provision made for the first plaintiff reconsidered.…
Aheb and Aheb (No. 3) [2009] FamCA 524
Citation 2

…92) 108 ALR 55 at 61–2); (2) inadvertent error ( Brown v Petranker (1991) 22 NSWLR 717 at 728 (application to recall a witness); Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612 at 614 (application to tender answers to interrogatories); Henning v Lynch [1974] 2 NSWLR 254 at 259 (application to re-open); (3) mistaken apprehension of…
Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22
Citation 3

…07 Cases Cited: Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529; Lollis v Loulatzis & Anor (No 3) [2008] VSC 231; Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22; Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd [2012] VSCA 232 Judgment: Application to re-open the first plaintiff’s case granted, and provision made for the f…
The Silver Fox Company Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Baker Family Trust v Lenard's Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] FCA 1310
Citation 4

…tion for leave to re-open: see UTA at 478; also The Silver Fox Co Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Baker Family Trust v Lenard’s Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] FCA 1310 (“Silver Fox”) at [22] and [25].”[8]…
Smith v New South Wales Bar Association [1992] HCA 36
Citation 5

…and are not exhaustive. These four classes are (1) fresh evidence ( Hughes v Hill [1937] SASR 285 at 287; Smith v New South Wales Bar Assn [No 2] (1992) 108 ALR 55 at 61–2); (2) inadvertent error ( Brown v Petranker (1991) 22 NSWLR 717 at 728 (application to recall a witness); Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612 at 614…
Bailey v Marinoff [1971] HCA 49
Citation 6

…d Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 1958, s(7)-(8); County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2008, r60A.02, r60A.07 Cases Cited: Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529; Lollis v Loulatzis & Anor (No 3) [2008] VSC 231; Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22; Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd [2012]…
Petranker v Brown [1991] HCATrans 208
Citation 7

…es v Hill [1937] SASR 285 at 287; Smith v New South Wales Bar Assn [No 2] (1992) 108 ALR 55 at 61–2); (2) inadvertent error ( Brown v Petranker (1991) 22 NSWLR 717 at 728 (application to recall a witness); Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612 at 614 (application to tender answers to interrogatories); Henning v Lynch [1974]…
Lollis v Loulatzis (No 3) [2008] VSC 231
Citation 8

…8); County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2008, r60A.02, r60A.07 Cases Cited: Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529; Lollis v Loulatzis & Anor (No 3) [2008] VSC 231; Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22; Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd [2012] VSCA 232 Judgment: Application to re-open the fi…
Tomamichel v McCann (No 1) [2014] VCC 246
Citation 9

…[1][2014] VCC 246…

AI Chat coming soon