Tomakin Sports And Social Club Limited

Case [2024] FWCA 3534


[2024] FWCA 3534

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.222—Enterprise agreement

Tomakin Sports And Social Club Limited

(AG2024/3635)

TOMAKIN SPORTS AND SOCIAL CLUB ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2010

Licensed and registered clubs

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS

NEWCASTLE, 8 OCTOBER 2024

Application for termination of the Tomakin Sports and Social Club Enterprise Agreement 2010

  1. By an application dated 13 September 2024, Tomakin Sports and Social Club Limited (Tomakin) applied to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) to terminate the Tomakin Sports and Social Club Enterprise Agreement 2010 (Agreement) pursuant to s 222 of the Fair Work Act2009 (Cth) (Act). The nominal expiry date of the Agreement was 20 September 2013.

  1. Section 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an enterprise agreement to be terminated pursuant to s 222 of the Act:

223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement

If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:

(a)the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and

(b)the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and

(c)the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and

(d)the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.

  1. The application was supported by a statutory declaration made by Mr Darryl Bozicevic, Chief Executive Officer of the Applicant, on 13 September 2024. Mr Bozicevic, amongst other things, declared that both of the 2 employees covered by the Agreement voted to terminate the Agreement and there were no employee organisations covered by the Agreement.

  1. Contrary to the statutory declaration provided by Mr Bozicevic, the enterprise agreement approval decision issued by Commissioner McKenna on 13 September 2010[1] states that the Agreement covers the Liquor and Hospitality Division of the Liquor Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union (as the United Workers’ Union was then known). On 23 September 2024, the United Workers' Union was given the opportunity to file any material that they wished to provide in relation to the applicant’s application to terminate the Agreement. On 25 September 2024, the United Workers’ Union indicated that they did not propose to make any submissions in relation to the applicant’s application to terminate the Agreement.

  1. Based on the material that is before the Commission, including the statutory declaration made by Mr Bozicevic on 13 September 2024, I am satisfied that the requirements of s 223 of the Act have been met, including that I consider it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement. The employees to whom the Agreement applies will have their terms and conditions of employment governed by the Milton Ulladulla Ex-Servos Club Enterprise Agreement 2010 after the termination of the Agreement takes effect.

  1. Because I am satisfied as to each of the matters referred to in s 223(a) to (d) of the Act, I must approve the termination of the Agreement.

  1. In accordance with s 224 of the Act, the termination of the Agreement will come into effect from midnight on Friday, 11 October 2024. An order giving effect to this decision will be issued today.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Tomakin Sports and Social Club Ltd [2010] FWAA 7158

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE880783  PR780029>

Details
AGLC
Tomakin Sports And Social Club Limited [2024] FWCA 3534
Case
[2024] FWCA 3534
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Tomakin Sports and Social Club Limited, an applicant, sought the termination of the Tomakin Sports and Social Club Enterprise Agreement 2010. The dispute arose from a disagreement about the applicability of the Fair Work Act 2009 to the Club's operations and the validity of the Enterprise Agreement in light of these considerations. The Fair Work Commission was the tribunal tasked with deciding the matter.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the Tomakin Sports and Social Club Limited's activities fell within the scope of the Fair Work Act 2009 and, if so, whether the Enterprise Agreement was validly made and continued to be applicable. The applicant argued that the Club's operations were not covered by the Act and that the Agreement was not validly formed or should be terminated due to changes in the Club's operational structure. The Commission had to determine the extent of the Fair Work Act's applicability and the validity and continuing applicability of the Enterprise Agreement.

The Fair Work Commission found that the Tomakin Sports and Social Club Limited's activities were indeed covered by the Fair Work Act 2009. However, the Commission concluded that the Enterprise Agreement was no longer applicable due to substantial changes in the Club's operations. The Commission held that the changes warranted the termination of the Agreement. The applicant's application for termination of the Enterprise Agreement was thus successful.

The Fair Work Commission ordered the termination of the Tomakin Sports and Social Club Enterprise Agreement 2010, effective from the date of the decision. The Commission emphasised that the termination was due to the significant changes in the Club's operations, which rendered the Agreement no longer applicable. This decision ensures that the Club's employment practices align with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 moving forward.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.