| [2019] FWCA 480 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Ltd
(AG2018/6739)
TOMAGO ALUMINIUM COMPANY PTY LIMITED - AUSTRALIAN WORKERS’ UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Aluminium industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 29 JANUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Limited - Australian Workers’ Union Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Limited - Australian Workers’ Union Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 6.1 – Annual leave
• Clause 6.2 – Personal leave
• Clause 6.4 – Compassionate leave
However, noting clause 1.6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 February 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501486 PR704327>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 480
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 480
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for enterprise agreements, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. This required the Commission to consider if the agreement provided for the minimum entitlements set out in the National Employment Standards, and if it balanced the interests of both employers and employees fairly. Additionally, the Commission had to ensure the agreement did not discriminate against any group of employees and was consistent with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act.
The Commission examined the provisions of the agreement and found that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The agreement contained provisions that met the minimum entitlements required by law and did not unjustifiably disadvantage any party. The Commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and reflected a fair balance between the parties' interests. Consequently, the Commission approved the Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Limited - Australian Workers’ Union Enterprise Agreement 2019, determining that it met the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act.
The final orders included the approval of the enterprise agreement, with the terms to take effect from the date of the Commission's decision. This decision sets a precedent for similar agreements and ensures that the terms and conditions of employment in the agreement are legally sound and enforceable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.