Toma Akaruru v Nigel Voigt

[2015] FWC 6268

[2015] FWC 6268

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.739—Dispute resolution

Toma Akaruru
v
Nigel Voigt
(C2015/4740)

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE SYDNEY, 9 SEPTEMBER 2015

Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the modern award and the NES; [s146].

[1] This application was listed for conference in Sydney on 20 August 2015.

[2] A process for resolution of the dispute was agreed.

[3] I agree to consider the submissions of the parties and the material supplied to date by way of Summons to Produce Documents. I also considered the statement of Mr Akaruru.

[4] I am now in a position to publish my finding regarding the employment of Mr Akaruru arising from this notification.

Finding

[5] The applicant was employed by the respondent in the onsite building, engineering and civil construction industry as defined in paragraph 4.1 of the Building and Construction General Onsite Award (the Award), from 17 June 2013 to 11 June 2014.

[6] The applicant was classified under the Award as a Construction Worker Level 1, under the categories CW/ECW1 (level a), for the first three (3) months of his said employment and CW/ECW1 (level b), for the balance of his employment.

[7] The minimum weekly wage for the said classifications pursuant to the 2013/2014 Annual Wage Review under the Award dated 19 June 2014, were:

(1) CW/ECW 1 (level a) $673.60

(2) CW/ECW 1 (level b) $687.50

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

J W Dodd, of counsel, for the applicant

M Gaven, of counsel, for the respondent

Conference details:

2015.

Sydney:

20 August.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR571737>